Obamacare & Eugenics 101: Princeton Professor “Quite Reasonable” To Murder Disabled Babies? (VIDEO)

Fotor01016224251Ct Patriot: Let me ask you something? Is this 1938 in Nazi Germany? It sure seems like it to me. I am sure anyone who escaped the horrors of Hitlers Reich and made it to America that is still alive today would be more than glad to explain to the sheeple of our nation that this is exactly what happened in Germany in the late 30’s. Good ole’ Adolph nationalizted health care as well. And whom were the first people he decided to remove from society? the handicapped and “simple minded” as they liked to say. Just like this Princeton professor is saying, But its not him I am worried about. Its In the Law, Yes there are Death Panels people. So they start with the weakest among us, those who cannot defend themselves. The unborn and born with problems. Then I am sure the Veterans, are true heroes are next. You can already see what Obama has done to the VA hospitals. So after Obamacare removes them from the burden on the socialist utopia he has created. Who is next? My guess Christians and anyone else who doesn’t fit into Obama’s brave new world. Can’t we see where this is all going before it is too late? If it is not already?  Are we now a country without a spine? A soul? A conscience? Take a look below and let me know what you think about Obamacare’s Nazi-ish Eugenics Program?

download

ETHICS PROFESSOR SAYS IT’S “QUITE REASONABLE” TO KILL DISABLED BABIES VIA OBAMACARE

Has anyone else noticed that most professors of ethics aren’t exactly…ummm….ethical?

by DAISY LUTHER

THE ORGANIC PREPPER

APRIL 21, 2015

download (4)Has anyone else noticed that most professors of ethics aren’t exactly…ummm….ethical? At least the ones who get quoted, anyway.

A professor at the highly esteemed Princeton University doesn’t want his Obamacare premiums to increase because of caring for severely disabled babies. Dr. Pete Singer, who teaches ethics (but perhaps needs a little refresher on what the word “ethics” means) argued during a radio interview on Sunday that America should be more accepting of “intentionally ending the lives of severely disabled infants.”

First, a definition:

Ethics:  that branch of philosophy dealingwith values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightnessand wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness ofthe motives and ends of such actions.

In the famous words of Inigo Montoya, “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Singer, a longtime mouthpiece for eugenicists everywhere, has previously drawn fire for his belief that the right to life is directly related to a person’s intelligence and  ability to feel pleasure and pain, is back in the spotlight.  In 1993, wrote a treatise called “Practical Ethics: Taking Life: Humans.”

Singer argued for the morality of “non-voluntary euthanasia” for human beings not capable of understanding the choice between life and death, including “severely disabled infants, and people who through accident, illness, or old age have permanently lost the capacity to understand the issue involved.”

For Singer, the wrongness of killing a human being is not based on the fact that the individual is alive and human. Instead, Singer argued it is “characteristics like rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness that make a difference.” (source)

images (6)He clearly hasn’t changed his mind. During the interview he argued that it was “quite reasonable” to ration healthcare for disabled infants:

I think if you had a health-care system in which governments were trying to say, “Look, there are some things that don’t provide enough benefits given the costs of those treatments. And if we didn’t do them we would be able to do a lot more good for other people who have better prospects,” then yes.

I think it would be reasonable for governments to say, “This treatment is not going to be provided on the national health service if it’s a country with a national health service. Or in the United States on Medicare or Medicade.”

For full article click here please

Eugenics & Obamacare – The Ultimate in Political Manipulation

January 1, 2014

Eugenics. It’s a word we don’t hear much these days, but its results are all around us. Back on the farm we called it “selective breeding.” Every dairyman or herdsman or Kentucky Derby contender selects the best of his herd as breeding stock. Can the same principle be applied to humans? Of course. Adolph Hitler used the practice to create what he called a “master race.” Loretta Lynn and Conway Twitty recorded, “You Are the Reason Our Kids are Ugly.” Nobody wants ugly kids, so in this enlightened era of single motherhood, sperm banks catalog their inventory according to eye color, hair color, nose shape, etc. Eugenics? Of course. Harmless? Probably. But are more sinister uses possible? Certainly.

images (4)Is the concept new? Of course not. The founder of eugenics, Sir Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin, felt that the softness of civilization had prevented the kind of natural selection occurring in Darwin’s Origin of Species from happening in humans, thus creating an unnaturally high number of weak and feeble-minded people. So it was up to governments to augment natural selection through the practice of selective breeding — or eugenics. At that time it was felt that desirable citizens tended to be white, athletic, intelligent, and wealthy, and those it considered to be undesirable tended to be black, Jewish, disabled, or poor. So the power of the state was, and still is, encouraged to promote increases in the number of desirable citizens (positive eugenics) and decreases in the number of undesirable citizens (negative eugenics).
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/eugenics-obamacare-ultimate-political-manipulation/#ij5JUfjLycD8p25B.99

images (1)

Rand Paul Exposes: Die! Baby Die! Female Democrat Head For Aborting Baby At 9 Months! (VIDEO)

Fotor01016224251Ct Patriot: I support fully what Rand Paul is saying here. But are any of you shocked by the DNC response to this? Do you really not see what the abortion agenda is in America? Women’s rights? So now women can commit murder? Abortion at 9 months is inexcusable. And if you think 9 months to abort a life is bad then you’ll be even more sicked when you see that some of these so called Democrat “progressives” are for aborting children up until the age of 3 yrs old. Just as much as the want grandma and grandpa to die as quick as possible. they love when a viable life is not allowed to breath its first breath outside of it’s mothers womb. As a father of 3 beautiful children, who has gone through all 3 of the pregnancies and births. Including the ultrasounds. I can tell you that if you can see your child and hear its heart beat and you still don’t think its alive. There is something very wrong with you not the baby. they call is a fetus to limit your emotional link to it. But its a baby, a child, a living human being. Don’t all lives matter? Now I am not even getting into the whole abortion debate right yet, Or the satanic sacrifice aspect yet. But a late -term abortion is murder. If you disagree then have the balls to look below and see what a late term “fetus” looks like after being aborted. It looks like a dead BABY to me….now tell me

download (11)

RAND PAUL EXPOSES DNC HEAD: “IT SOUNDS LIKE SHE’S OK WITH KILLING A 7-POUND BABY”

Presidential candidate wants to know if Democratic Party supports late term abortions

by STEVE WATSON

INFOWARS.COM

APRIL 9, 2015

2016 Presidential candidate Rand Paul yesterday made his position on abortion crystal clear, and forced the hand of the DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, goading her into an admission that she is in favor of limitless abortions, including late-term abortions, up until the day of birth.

When Paul was asked by a partisan AP reporter about his views on abortion recently, and what exemptions to a ban that he would support, he responded by noting how the debate is always framed to shoot down his opinions.

download (9)“Here’s the deal—we always seen to have the debate waaaaay over here on what are the exact details of exemptions, or when it starts,” said Paul, moving his hands to the left.

“Why don’t we ask the DNC: Is it okay to kill a seven-pound baby in the uterus?” Paul added.

“You go back and you ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a seven-pound baby that is not born yet. Ask her when life begins, and you ask Debbie when it’s okay to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, get back to me.” the Senator noted.

Wasserman Schultz DID reply, giving the following answer to reporters:

download (13)“Here’s an answer,” said Schultz. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’? And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me.”

In an appearance on CNN, Paul stood his ground and told Wolf Blitzer it appeared the Democratic leader wasn’t opposed to late-term abortions.

“Sounds like her answer is yes, that she’s okay with killing a seven-pound baby,” he said.

download (10)Paul added that “even most of my friends who are pro-choice are opposed to such abortions.”

“But Debbie’s position, which I guess is the Democrat Party’s position, that an abortion all the way up until the day of birth would be fine, I think most pro-choice people would be really uncomfortable with that,” he added. “So I don’t know — I really think she’s got some explaining to do.”

The procedure for late term abortions is horrific, but it gives some context to note what it entails. The unborn child is rotated until it is facing feet downwards, then the body is yanked out of the uterus, with the exception of its head, and out of the woman’s body. A hole is then punctured into the base of the fetal skull, and the brains are sucked out through a tube.

for full article please click here

download (14)

Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill.: You Taxpayers Have an ‘Obligation’ to Fund Abortions

Congresswoman: Taxpayers Have an ‘Obligation’ to Fund Abortions

TheBlaze.com
September 29, 2010
by Meredith Jessup

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., not only believes that women should be able to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy, but also favors a full repeal of existing federal policy which limits taxpayer funding for abortions. According to the Illinois Democrat, “there’s no evidence” that increasing access to abortion services encourages people to get abortions.

CNSNews.com‘s Nichola Ballasy caught up with the congresswoman today during an event on Capitol Hill sponsored by the Center for Reproductive Freedom to ask her about call for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment. When asked about whether access to abortion may encourage more women to take the drastic step, Rep. Schakowsky replied, “No, there’s no evidence of that around the world, where access to abortion is more available but somehow women are more inclined to get one.”

“What happens is that women who don’t have access resort, as we heard today, to very dangerous, self-inflicted kinds of things in order to end, terminate the pregnancy,” she said. “And so, you know, we go back to back alley abortions. We go back to coat hangers. And, I mean, is that what we want?”

“Women who are desperate enough to do that to themselves are going to somehow – going to try to abort that pregnancy. We don’t want to do that. We don’t want to put women at greater risk.”


(VIDEO) Read The Manifesto of Discovery Channel Gunman James J.Lee…Crazed Environmentalist, Eugenicist…(PHOTOS)

Manifesto of Discovery Channel Gunman: Environmentalist/Eugenicist Who Demanded Halt to Birth Of “Parasitic Human Infants”

Save The Planet Protest (Archived Copy)
September 1, 2010

This is the manifesto of the gunman who has entered a Discovery Channel building in Silver Spring, reportedly with explosives strapped to his body. As you will read, he is a mentally disturbed eugenicist who wishes to see humans sterilized and infants aborted.

After the Drudge Report linked to this manifesto, the original website crashed, but we managed to recover an archived copy. The gunman’s name is being reported as James J. Lee. More on this coming soon.

The Discovery Channel MUST broadcast to the world their commitment to save the planet and to do the following IMMEDIATELY:

1. The Discovery Channel and it’s affiliate channels MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots based on Daniel Quinn’s “My Ishmael” pages 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done in the same way as the Industrial Revolution was done, by people building on each other’s inventive ideas. Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution. A game show format contest would be in order. Perhaps also forums of leading scientists who understand and agree with the Malthus-Darwin science and the problem of human overpopulation. Do both. Do all until something WORKS and the natural world starts improving and human civilization building STOPS and is reversed! MAKE IT INTERESTING SO PEOPLE WATCH AND APPLY SOLUTIONS!!!!

2. All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions. In those programs’ places, programs encouraging human sterilization and infertility must be pushed. All former pro-birth programs must now push in the direction of stopping human birth, not encouraging it.

3. All programs promoting War and the technology behind those must cease. There is no sense in advertising weapons of mass-destruction anymore. Instead, talk about ways to disassemble civilization and concentrate the message in finding SOLUTIONS to solving global military mechanized conflict. Again, solutions solutions instead of just repeating the same old wars with newer weapons. Also, keep out the fraudulent peace movements. They are liars and fakes and had no real intention of ending the wars. ALL OF THEM ARE FAKE! On one hand, they claim they want the wars to end, on the other, they are demanding the human population increase. World War II had 2 Billion humans and after that war, the people decided that tripling the population would assure peace. WTF??? STUPIDITY! MORE HUMANS EQUALS MORE WAR!

4. Civilization must be exposed for the filth it is. That, and all its disgusting religious-cultural roots and greed. Broadcast this message until the pollution in the planet is reversed and the human population goes down! This is your obligation. If you think it isn’t, then get hell off the planet! Breathe Oil! It is the moral obligation of everyone living otherwise what good are they??

5. Immigration: Programs must be developed to find solutions to stopping ALL immigration pollution and the anchor baby filth that follows that. Find solutions to stopping it. Call for people in the world to develop solutions to stop it completely and permanently. Find solutions FOR these countries so they stop sending their breeding populations to the US and the world to seek jobs and therefore breed more unwanted pollution babies. FIND SOLUTIONS FOR THEM TO STOP THEIR HUMAN GROWTH AND THE EXPORTATION OF THAT DISGUSTING FILTH! (The first world is feeding the population growth of the Third World and those human families are going to where the food is! They must stop procreating new humans looking for nonexistant jobs!)

6. Find solutions for Global Warming, Automotive pollution, International Trade, factory pollution, and the whole blasted human economy. Find ways so that people don’t build more housing pollution which destroys the environment to make way for more human filth! Find solutions so that people stop breeding as well as stopping using Oil in order to REVERSE Global warming and the destruction of the planet!

7. Develop shows that mention the Malthusian sciences about how food production leads to the overpopulation of the Human race. Talk about Evolution. Talk about Malthus and Darwin until it sinks into the stupid people’s brains until they get it!!

8. Saving the Planet means saving what’s left of the non-human Wildlife by decreasing the Human population. That means stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies! You’re the media, you can reach enough people. It’s your resposibility because you reach so many minds!!!

9. Develop shows that will correct and dismantle the dangerous US world economy. Find solutions for their disasterous Ponzi-Casino economy before they take the world to another nuclear war.

10. Stop all shows glorifying human birthing on all your channels and on TLC. Stop Future Weapons shows or replace the dialogue condemning the people behind these developments so that the shows become exposes rather than advertisements of Arms sales and development!

11. You’re also going to find solutions for unemployment and housing. All these unemployed people makes me think the US is headed toward more war.

Humans are the most destructive, filthy, pollutive creatures around and are wrecking what’s left of the planet with their false morals and breeding culture.

For every human born, ACRES of wildlife forests must be turned into farmland in order to feed that new addition over the course of 60 to 100 YEARS of that new human’s lifespan! THIS IS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FOREST CREATURES!!!! All human procreation and farming must cease!

It is the responsiblity of everyone to preserve the planet they live on by not breeding any more children who will continue their filthy practices. Children represent FUTURE catastrophic pollution whereas their parents are current pollution. NO MORE BABIES! Population growth is a real crisis. Even one child born in the US will use 30 to a thousand times more resources than a Third World child. It’s like a couple are having 30 babies even though it’s just one! If the US goes in this direction maybe other countries will too!

Also, war must be halted. Not because it’s morally wrong, but because of the catastrophic environmental damage modern weapons cause to other creatures. FIND SOLUTIONS JUST LIKE THE BOOK SAYS! Humans are supposed to be inventive. INVENT, DAMN YOU!!

The world needs TV shows that DEVELOP solutions to the problems that humans are causing, not stupify the people into destroying the world. Not encouraging them to breed more environmentally harmful humans.

Saving the environment and the remaning species diversity of the planet is now your mindset. Nothing is more important than saving them. The Lions, Tigers, Giraffes, Elephants, Froggies, Turtles, Apes, Raccoons, Beetles, Ants, Sharks, Bears, and, of course, the Squirrels.

The humans? The planet does not need humans.

You MUST KNOW the human population is behind all the pollution and problems in the world, and YET you encourage the exact opposite instead of discouraging human growth and procreation. Surely you MUST ALREADY KNOW this!

I want Discovery Communications to broadcast on their channels to the world their new program lineup and I want proof they are doing so. I want the new shows started by asking the public for inventive solution ideas to save the planet and the remaining wildlife on it.

These are the demands and sayings of Lee.

CtPatriot: This Guy was a Douchebag… I’m Glad he’s Dead…

‘RapeLay’ Video Game Goes Viral Despite Outrage…Virtual Rape…VIDEO DEMO!!!

‘RapeLay’ Video Game Goes Viral Amid Outrage…Virtual Rape…VIDEO DEMO!!!

By Kyung Lah
CNN
March 30, 2010
 
Tokyo, Japan (CNN) — The game begins with a teenage girl on a subway platform. She notices you are looking at her and asks, “Can I help you with something?”

That is when you, the player, can choose your method of assault.

With the click of your mouse, you can grope her and lift her skirt. Then you can follow her aboard the train, assaulting her sister and her mother.

As you continue to play, “friends” join in and in a series of graphic, interactive scenes, you can corner the women, rape them again and again.

The game allows you to even impregnate a girl and urge her to have an abortion. The reason behind your assault, explains the game, is that the teenage girl has accused you of molesting her on the train. The motive is revenge.

When does a video game go too far?

It is little wonder that the game, titled RapeLay, sparked international outrage from women’s groups. Taina Bien-Aime helped yank the game off store shelves worldwide.

“This was a game that had absolutely no place on the market,” said Taina Bien-Aime of women’s rights organization Equality Now which has campaigned for the game to be taken off the shelves.

But the controversy that led to stopping sales of the game instead took it viral.

That was how Lucy Kibble and Jim Gardner in Britain heard about it.

“I think the idea that you can do it by wholesale banning is just never going to work anyway because we downloaded it for free off the Internet,” Gardner said.

In the case of RapeLay, he was right. It is still readily available on dozens of Web sites, sometimes for free.

What happened to RapeLay is an example, said Bien-Aime, of why Japan needs to police game makers.

“It’s obviously very difficult to curtail activity on the Internet. But the governments do have a role in trying to regulate this sort of extreme pornography of children, both in their countries, and through the Internet ,” she said, adding that they were calling for the Japanese government “to ban all games that promote and simulate sexual violence, sexual torture, stalking and rape against women and girls. And there are plenty of games like that. ”

Those games are known as “hentai games.” Almost all feature girlish-looking characters. Some of the games are violent — depicting rape, torture and bondage in detail.

Step into a game shop in Akihabara, Japan’s electronics district, and hentai games are readily available. In minutes, we found a game similar to RapeLay. The object here is also revenge: Find and rape the woman who fired the player from his imaginary job. Along the way, the player can rape a number of other girls and women.

Hentai games are not new to Japan. This country has long produced products the rest of the world would call pornographic. But before the arrival of the Internet, such items stayed in Japan. Now, once a game goes on sale in Tokyo, it is digitized and shared everywhere.

Japan does have censorship laws for sexual content. In games and videos, genitalia are obscured, even if it is animated. But Japan’s laws do not restrict the themes and ideas of the games.

A national law that would make possession of real and virtual images of child porn illegal is under discussion, but no serious legislation has moved forward in Japan’s parliament.

CNN contacted the Gender Equality Promotion Division in the Gender Equality Bureau of Japan’s Cabinet Office, which is charged with handling the hentai gaming issue.

Despite repeated calls over a period of weeks, no representative from the government office would comment to CNN on camera. The office refused to make a statement on paper. A spokeswoman would only say over

For the  Full Story …http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/03/30/japan.video.game.rape/index.html?hpt=Sbin

Womens Rights: Utah Bill CRIMINALIZES Miscarriage…Is Your State Next???

Utah Bill Criminalizes Miscarriage

Reprodutive Health.com
By Rachel Larris
RH Reality Check

A bill passed by the Utah House and Senate this week and waiting for the governor’s signature, will make it a crime for a woman to have a miscarriage, and make induced abortion a crime in some instances.

According Lynn M. Paltrow, executive director of National Advocates for Pregnant Women, what makes Utah’s proposed law unique is that it is specifically designed to be punitive toward pregnant women, not those who might assist or cause an illegal abortion or unintended miscarriage.

The bill passed by legislators amends Utah’s criminal statute to allow the state to charge a woman with criminal homicide for inducing a miscarriage or obtaining an illegal abortion. The basis for the law was a recent case in which a 17-year-old girl, who was seven months pregnant, paid a man $150 to beat her in an attempt to cause a miscarriage. Although the girl gave birth to a baby later given up for adoption, she was initially charged with attempted murder. However the charges were dropped because, at the time, under Utah state law a woman could not be prosecuted for attempting to arrange an abortion, lawful or unlawful.

The bill passed by the Utah legislature would change that. While the bill does not affect legally obtained abortions, it criminalizes any actions taken by women to induce a miscarriage or abortion outside of a doctor’s care, with penalties including up to life in prison.

“What is really radical and different about this statute is that all of the other states’ feticide laws are directed to third party attackers,” Paltrow explained. “[Other states’ feticide laws] were passed in response to a pregnant woman who has been beaten up by a husband or boyfriend. Utah’s law is directed to the woman herself and that’s what makes it different and dangerous.”

In addition to criminalizing an intentional attempt to induce a miscarriage or abortion, the bill also creates a standard that could make women legally responsible for miscarriages caused by “reckless” behavior.

Using the legal standard of “reckless behavior” all a district attorney needs to show is that a woman behaved in a manner that is thought to cause miscarriage, even if she didn’t intend to lose the pregnancy. Drink too much alcohol and have a miscarriage? Under the new law such actions could be cause for prosecution.

“This creates a law that makes any pregnant woman who has a miscarriage potentially criminally liable for murder,” says Missy Bird, executive director of Planned Parenthood Action Fund of Utah. Bird says there are no exemptions in the bill for victims of domestic violence or for those who are substance abusers. The standard is so broad, Bird says, “there nothing in the bill to exempt a woman for not wearing her seatbelt who got into a car accident.”

Such a standard could even make falling down stairs a prosecutable event, such as the recent case in Iowa where a pregnant woman who fell down the stairs at her home was arrested under the suspicion she was trying to terminate her pregnancy.

“This statute and the standards chosen leave a large number of pregnant women vulnerable to arrest even though they have no intention of ending a pregnancy,” Paltrow said. “Whether or not the legislature intended this bill to become a tool for policing and punishing all pregnant women, if enacted this law would permit prosecution of a pregnant woman who stayed with her abusive husband because she was unable to leave. Not leaving would, under the ‘reckless’ standard, constitute conduct that consciously disregarded a substantial risk,” Paltrow explained.

While many states have fetal homicide laws most apply only in the third trimester. Utah’s bill would apply throughout the entirety of a woman’s pregnancy. Even first trimester miscarriages could become the basis for a murder trial.

Bird said she is also concerned that the law will drive pregnant women with substance abuse problems “underground;” afraid to seek treatment lest they have a miscarriage and be charged for murder. She said it directly reverses the attempts made, though a bill passed in 2008, to encourage pregnant women to seek treatment for addiction.

Paltrow added that the commonly thought belief that pregnant women who use drugs are engaging in behavior that is likely to cause a stillbirth or a miscarriage is wrong.

“Science now makes clear that drug use by pregnant women does not create unique risks for pregnant women, although it is likely that among those targeted for prosecutions by this statute will be women who go to term under drug usage,” she said.

The bill does exempt from prosecution fetal deaths due to failure to follow medical advice, accept treatment or refuse a cesarean section. Bird said this exemption was likely because of a 2004 case where a woman who was pregnant with twins was later charged with criminal homicide after one of the babies was stillborn, which the state deemed due to her refusal to have a cesarean section.

Planned Parenthood and the ACLU of Utah worked together to “amend the hell out of the bill,” Bird said. One of their few accomplishments was at least dropping the legal standard of “negligence” from the bill, a much lower standard than “recklessness.”

Bird was shaken with emotion after the Senate vote. “I broke down and cried,” she admitted. “I normally never let these kind of [legislative] battles get to me.”

“What really sucks is that we had three supposed allies in the Senate, three [Democratic] women, who voted for the bill,” Bird said, adding she didn’t yet know why the three senators switched votes.

Marina Lowe is legislative and policy counsel for the ACLU of Utah. She worked in tandem with Bird on trying to derail or at least mitigate the worst aspects of the bill. Lowe says at this point she doesn’t know if there is a potential constitutional challenge to the law once it is signed by the governor.

But she points to cases like the one in Iowa as exactly the kind of situation that might arise once this law is put into place.

Paltrow says this bill puts a lie to the idea that the pro-life movement cares about women.

“For all these years the anti-choice movement has said ‘we want to outlaw abortion, not put women in jail, but what this law says is ‘no, we really want to put women in jail.'”

Elizabeth Edwards leaves “Dirt Bag” John Edwards as Sex Tape, Abortion Plea are Exposed…VIDEO…

Ex-Edwards Aide Claims Presidential Hopeful Pushed for Rielle Hunter to Abort, Was Infuriated by Pregnancy

By JAMES HILL, TERI WHITCRAFT, NADINE SHUBAILAT and LAUREN SHER
Jan. 28, 2010

Former John Edwards’ aide Andrew Young, who covered up the Democratic presidential candidate’s affair, said when he cleaned up his house after his role in the cover-up ended he found one more shocker.

There was one tape that was marked ‘special,'” Young told ABC News’ Bob Woodruff in an exclusive interview. “It’s a sex tape of Rielle and John Edwards made just a couple of months before the Iowa caucuses.”

Though Young never saw the woman’s face in the tape, he said she was “visibly pregnant” and was “wearing a bracelet” and a “thumb ring” typically worn by Rielle Hunter.

“It’s her jewelry,” Andrew Young’s wife, Cheri, told ABC News. “It could be on another woman with the same jewelry.”

Young gives his account of the sex scandal and the elaborate cover-up for the Democratic presidential candidate in a new tell-all book titled, “The Politician,” which will be released Jan. 30.

He details how he and wife Cheri briefly returned to Raleigh, N.C., in July 2008 to clear out the house where Hunter had briefly lived before their December 2007 escape from the media. Young claims they found a box Hunter had left behind, which included some videotapes, in a pile of trash.

“It [the tape] was cut and pulled … out,” Cheri Young told ABC News, “We… taped it back together and we played it.”

ABC News has learned that Hunter filed for a temporary restraining order that seeks to prohibit Andrew and Cheri Young from possessing and distributing photos or video that she contends are her property.

Young, who had worked for Edwards since his 1998 Senate win, said he was absolutely sure it was his boss in the tape.

“It’s definitely him. You never see her face. But you see — you clearly see his face for a long time. And I can’t speak for the other body parts, but it’s definitely his face,” Young told ABC News.

“It [the tape] was cut and pulled … out,” Cheri Young told ABC News, “We… taped it back together and we played it.”

ABC News has learned that Hunter filed for a temporary restraining order that seeks to prohibit Andrew and Cheri Young from possessing and distributing photos or video that she contends are her property.

Young, who had worked for Edwards since his 1998 Senate win, said he was absolutely sure it was his boss in the tape.

“It’s definitely him. You never see her face. But you see — you clearly see his face for a long time. And I can’t speak for the other body parts, but it’s definitely his face,” Young told ABC News.

  • ctpatriots feed

  • an Edgy new school Conservative blog
  • FREE CtPatriot BUMPER STICKER

  • the lacs

  • KRS 1 On Obama and the New World Order

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • The Savage Nation

  • ctpatriots archives

  • Ronald Reagan on Socialism & Liberalism

  • Louis Farrakhan – “Murder by Injection”

    I can't bleiev it but he's right ...
  • Glenn Beck talks about New World Order with Ron Paul

    Is Glenn Beck yanking our chain or is he sincerely worried about the prospect of a New World Order and a One World Currency?

  • And Why does Rush Limbaugh Agree WIth Farrakahn??? Because its true?

    If  i can agree with them both  ... it makes too much sense

    Only in an Obamanation could this Occur.

  • Alex Jones The EndGame .. full version

  • Blog Engage Blog Forum and Blogging Community, Free Blog Submissions and Blog Traffic, Blog Directory, Article Submissions, Blog Traffic
  • The Obama Deception…full version

  • the Mike Church Show

  • “lil” Jimmy Norton Kills….

    How small is Jimmy???
  • Blog Catalog

    Conservative  Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
  • the Ron & Fez Show

  • RevueLink .com

  • Entertainment blog
  • Dr. Bill Deagle

  • Rense.com

  • Star Trek 2009

  • Dave Hodges: Common Sense Show

  • Submit URL @ OptionAdd Search.  
  • Follow A Ct Patriot's Blog on WordPress.com
  • Infowars.com

  • Jesus or Muhammad