Insane? Obama Oks 400% Spike In Radiation Levels, Cancer Deaths To Skyrocket! VIDEO

Fotor01016224251Ct Patriot: Ok so now our Dictator in chief has declared that radiation is good for you. So Drink up America. This guy is just a gift that keeps on giving isn’t he? Like Herpes! But it is not just good to drink, It is even better to bath in. Oh sure your skin absorbs it but that is half the fun right? And please don’t you all worry about Cancer rates skyrocketing, I am sure with Obamacare we will all be just fine. Couple of aspirin and good as new. We have a Madman in the Whitehouse. And his name is Barrack Insane Obama. Well its actually Barry, but that is a whole ‘nother subject. I see nothing but pure evil from this False President but the Sheeple still follow their Messiah…

 

thCA99621P

 

Obama Approves Raising Permissible Levels of Nuclear Radiation in Drinking Water. Civilian Cancer Deaths Expected to Skyrocket

Rollback in Nuclear Radiation Cleanup

Just Released Benghazi Documents Prove Hillary Clinton’s Huge Cover-Up! VIDEOS

Fotor01016224251Ct Patriot: ” What difference does it make?”  Now that the lies are coming home to roost. And that there is proof of a massive State Dept. cover-up of the attack on 4 Us citizens and resulted in their torturous deaths. A State Dept. run by Clinton at the time.  As help was told to stand down by co-accomplice Obama. So they sat as these men died. Then they Lied! Now we have proof. What’s gonna be done now? What will it take sheeple?

hshssh

Judicial Watch Obtains ‘Smoking Gun’ Benghazi Documents

State Dept., Clinton involved in massive cover-up

by Jerome Corsi | WND | January 27, 2015

Documents obtained Monday through a federal court order show State Department officials disseminated the false story that the 2012 Benghazi attack that killed a U.S. ambassador was nothing more than the violent escalation of a demonstration by Muslims against an insulting video, even though they knew it was a coordinated military-style assault.

beng2Among the documents obtained by the Washington-based government watchdog Judicial Watch was a memo sent the day after the Sept. 11, 2012, attack to the U.S. Embassy in Tunis, Tunisia, by the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Command Center titled “Emergency Message to U.S. Citizens: Demonstrations.”

The Diplomatic Security Command Center, or DSCC, was well aware that the attack was carried out by highly organized and armed Islamic militia, because the DSCC was the unit that monitored the attack in real time via video transmissions from a drone.

The message is identical to the emergency message issued by the U.S. Embassy in Tunis and archived on the embassy’s website.

ccxxxThe emergency message reads in the first paragraph: “On September 11, 2012, violent demonstrations took place at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt and at the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, resulting in damage in both locations and casualties in Benghazi. Media reports indicate that demonstrations may take place at the U.S. Embassy in Tunis on Wednesday, September 12, 2012.”

Read more

BENGHAZI – THE BIGGEST COVER-UP SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY? – WAS BENGHAZI A CIA GUN-RUNNING OPERATION FOR MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD & OTHER INSURGENTS FIGHTING IN SYRIA?

Benghazi, Today’s News

LibertyNEWS.com – Editorial Team Special Report

thxxxxxIt’s never fun to admit you’ve been lied to and duped. There is no comfort in realizing a high-level group in government has conned you. The wound created from such a realization would be deep and painful when paired with extraordinary insult when you realize the cons are people you not only trusted, but people who are tasked with protecting your rights, your liberty, your life.

thfdeddddWhen these people betray you, you’re in trouble – big trouble. Unfortunately, we believe America is being betrayed by powerful individuals tasked with our protection. These people are found in the White House, the Congress, the CIA and other government entities – and they’re lying to you. Then they’re covering it up on an epic scale, in a never-before-seen manner.

Here are the basics of what the schemers in government and the complicit media would like for us all to focus on and buy into:

  • Why wasn’t there better security at the consulate (keep this misleading word in mind) in Benghazi?
  • Why didn’t authorization come to move special forces in for protection and rescue?
  • Why was an obscure video blamed when everyone knew the video had nothing to do with it?
  • Did Obama’s administration cover-up the true nature of the attacks to win an election?

– See more at: http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/benghazi-the-biggest-cover-up-scandal-in-u-s-history-was-benghazi-a-cia-gun-running-operation-for-muslim-brotherhood-other-insurgents-fighting-in-syria/#sthash.QGr0k4En.dpuf

beng

InfoWarrior Alex Jones Schools Obama’s Terrorist Professor Bill Ayers (VIDEO)

Ct Patriot: I just love seeing these socialist, whom think they are so far superior to us common folk. I just love seeing them struggle to answer any real world questions without their liberal hyperbole. Good job by Alex Jones for getting this interview and not throwing softballs at this terrorist and murderer Bill Ayers friend of Barry.

oooo

Alex Jones Debates Bill Ayers

Jones clashes with Weather Underground founder

by Infowars.com

January 21, 2015

thooooooAlex Jones welcomes avowed socialist and founder of the Weather Underground, Bill Ayers, to the show and debates him about his past and who he really represents.

thkkkk

Ayers and Obama: What the Media Hid

by John Sexton

4 Jun 2012

Obama’s connection to Bill Ayers, like his connection to Jeremiah Wright, briefly became a campaign issue in 2008. The Obama campaign was quick to distance the candidate from the 60’s domestic terrorist, even as blogs continued to dig up evidence connecting the two men.pppkpkp Eventually the issue became enough of a story that, on October 3rd, the NY Times weighed with a piece titled “Obama and ’60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed Paths” by author Scott Shane. Looking back it’s clear that the Times’ story downplayed or overlooked some significant connections between the two men, connections which may have raised red flags for some voters.

According to Bill Ayers’ next door neighbor, Senator Barack Obama was a guest at a 4th of July party Ayers hosted in 2005. The date is significant because it effectively undercuts the claim, made by the Obama campaign during the 2008 election cycle, that Obama and Ayers were merely acquaintances who had only crossed paths a few times since 2000. Obama’s attendance at the party suggests they were friends.

Scott Shane clearly didn’t know about the 2005 party. Indeed, he writes near the end of his piece “Since 2002, there is little public evidence of their relationship.” But it now appears Shane was intentionally misled by Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt who he quotes as follows:

“The suggestion that Ayers was a political adviser to Obama or someone who shaped his political views is patently false,” said Ben LaBolt, a campaign spokesman. Mr. LaBolt said the men first met in 1995 through the education project, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, and have encountered each other occasionally in public life or in the neighborhood. He said they have not spoken by phone or exchanged e-mail messages since Mr. Obama began serving in the United States Senate in January 2005 and last met more than a year ago when they bumped into each other on the street in Hyde Park.

for full article click here please

thplpplplp

(VIDEO) President Obama Gets Pissed Off At Aids Activist Hecklers, They Dare Question Obama…

Heckling From AIDS Activists Irritates Obama During Boston Rally

Theblaze.com
October 16, 2010
by Scott Baker

BOSTON (AP) — With the congressional elections fast approaching, President Barack Obama acknowledged Saturday that the hope and energy he stirred during his presidential campaign may have faded in the face of a grinding economic crisis.

“We’re doing the grinding, sometimes frustrating work of actually delivering change. I know it can be discouraging,” Obama told a crowd of 10,000 at an energetic rally at Boston’s Hynes Convention Center.

Obama came to Boston to campaign for his friend and political ally, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, who is struggling to overcome the anti-incumbent mood that has swept across the country during this election season.Obama said Patrick’s opponent is banking on the same strategy as national Republicans.

Obama’s remarks were interrupted twice by protesters demanding more funding for HIV/AIDS. Supporters in the crowd tried to drowned out the protesters by chanting, “Yes We Can,” Obama’s slogan during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Obama responded directly to the protesters, saying his administration had increased AIDS funding and told them to, “take a look at what the Republican leadership has to say about AIDS funding.”

Obama called on Democrats to show up on election day.

“I need all of you to be clear,” he told the crowd, “over the next two weeks this election is a choice and the stakes could not be higher.”

Obama also spoke at a fundraiser near Boston Saturday that was expected to raise $500,000 for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Heckling From AIDS Activists Irritates Obama During Boston Rally


(PHOTO PROOF) Pro-Obama ‘One Nation’ Socialist Rally Falls Far Short Of Glenn Becks 8/28…

One Nation Rally: Weak Display of Leftism

the new American
by Raven Clabough
03 October 2010

In an effort to rival Glenn Beck’s 8/28 “Restoring Honor” rally, progressive and left-wing groups held the “One Nation Working Together” rally on Saturday, October 2 at the National Mall in Washington. Much to the chagrin of the organizers, however, which were comprised of 400 organizations ranging from labor unions to environmental groups, they could not muster up the crowd of up to 500,000 that Beck drew, even after union leaders forced their members to attend Saturday’s event. Low numbers were not the sole disappointment of the rally either. Despite the alleged unifying goal of the rally, the liberal organizations could not help but use the platform to promote liberalism, socialism, and progressivism.

According to the Washington Post, One Nation Working Together “was the left wing’s first large gathering designed to counter the conservative tea party phenomenon, and many speakers warned that a Republican-controlled Congress would block or roll back changes. Organizers said they also wanted to show that their supporters represent the majority of the nation.”

Restoring Honor Rally 8/28 (L) One Nation rally 10/2 (R)

Upon approaching the rally, attendees were greeted by members of the Socialist Party who handed out newspapers with the heading “Tax the Rich, End the Wars.” In fact, the groups present at the rally were seemingly disinterested in hiding their Marxist and Socialist agendas, as they proudly swayed flags bearing the word “Socialist,” “Socialist Party USA,” and “Communist Party USA,” as well as signs bearing the images of Che Grevera and even the hammer and sickle,the infamous communist emblem.

In addition to the American Socialist and Communist Parties, the event was sponsored by the NAACP, Van Jones’ Green For All, the National Council of La Raza, AFL-CIO, SEIU, George Soros’ Campus Progress, International Socialist Organization, the National Education Association, the American Federation of Teachers, Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network, the Gray Panthers, the Institute for Policy Studies, and many more notoriously radical organizations.

The Blaze adds, “President Barack Obama’s own ‘Organizing for America; has praised the effort, calling it the ‘biggest progressive demonstration in decades.”

Beck described the list of the event’s organizers as a “who’s who of the far-left in America.”

Entrepreneurs sold books evident of their Marxist ideologies, such as The Communist Manifesto, The Road to Socialism, Bolshevism, The American Menace, and many more.

Many of the same attendees were attired in shirts that read, “Obama/Biden 2008.”

While the event boasted a variety of speakers who talked about nearly everything, from education, to human rights, to jobs.

The Washington Independent writes, “Indeed, the main focus of yesterday’s gathering was jobs, and how the government should do more to promote them. This was evidenced by the thousands of signs and t-shirts that promoted the event’s main theme — ‘Jobs, Justice, and Education’ — as well as its heavily unionized supporters.”

Unemployed legal secretary Edrie Irvine spoke at the event against the recession, claiming it was caused by “banks, greed, and deregulation.”

Articulating similar sentiments was Mary Henry, president of SEIU, who said, “Corporations are preying on our fears and using this moment to expand their profit margins. This is the first recession where corporate margins are growing while wages are going down.”

In addition to jobs, attacking the Tea Party movement appeared to be a central focus at the event as well.

Liberal host of MSNBC’s “The Ed Show”,Ed Schultz , one of the event’s master of ceremonies, took the opportunity to criticize the tea party movement and conservatives in general.

“They talk about the Constitution, but they don’t want to live by it. They talk about the forefathers, but they practice discrimination. They want to change this country.”

Cab driver James Keane, an attendee at the rally, told reporters, “We’ve stood by and watched the Tea Party people go crazy every couple of months. It’s time for Democrats to stand up and fight for what they believe in. Obama has been a great leader, but so many in the Democratic leadership have been playing the fence.”

Yet, despite the clear attempts to mirror the enthusiasm of the Tea Parties and Beck’s rally, One Nation Working Together fell short in both enthusiasm and attendance.

While some of the organizers claim they drew the same crowds as Beck’s rally, The Daily Beast asserts, “For all the chanting about how ‘the people, united, will never be divided,’ this turnout was small and suffering from an enthusiasm gap compared to the conservative populists who crowded the mall a month ago for Glenn Beck’s ‘Restoring Honor’ rally.”

Similarly, the Associated Press reports, “Organizers claimed they had as many participants as Beck’s rally. But Saturday’s crowds were less dense and didn’t reach as far to the edges as they did during Beck’s rally.”


full story…One Nation Rally: Weak Display of Leftism


(NEW VIDEO) New Black Panther’s King Samir Shabazz: Whites Use Black Babies as ‘Alligator Bait’, ‘Fox Jews’…

New NBPP Video: King Samir Says Whites Use Black Babies as ‘Alligator Bait,‘ Laments ’Fox Jews’

TheBlaze.com
Sept. 28, 2010
Jonathon M. Seidl

A video recently released by Election Journal shows New Black Panther Party member King Samir Shabazz railing against the media and defending his remarks calling for the death of white babies.

The video, which includes a date stamp of August 9, 2010 and says it takes place in Harlem, features the hate-spewing King Samir attacking Fox.

“This is what King Samir and the Philadelphia chapter, along with the guidance and leadership of attorney Malik Shabazz, has been doing that you don’t hear about from Fox Jews; I’m sorry, Fox News.”

“Let’s talk about the little black babies that you use as alligator bait,” he adds:

H/T: Washington Examiner

In the past, King Samir has called on blacks to kill “crackers” and their babies:

King Samir was also filmed intimidating voters in Philadelphia in 2008 with a nightstick. That case has been the center of much controversy, as the Department of Justice downgraded the case after being awarded an initial full injunction:

The Malik Shabazz that King Samir refers to in the new video may be the same one that has appeared on multiple news organizations defending King Samir

New NBPP Vid: King Samir Says Whites Use Black Babies as ‘Alligator Bait,‘ Laments ’Fox Jews’

(VIDEO) Is Obama Going To Have America ‘Absorb A Terror Attack’ To Save His Presidency?, And Crush Resistance To Big Gov.???

Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

Ominous words suggest desperate administration could turn to false flag in bid to crush resistance against big government

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
September 22, 2010

President Obama’s ominous claim that America can “absorb” a terror attack will have many fearing that staging some kind of false flag event will be the only way the government can overturn the massive resistance to big government that has grown exponentially since Obama took office.

During an interview with journalist Bob Woodward, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.”

However, the only thing that was made stronger by 9/11 was the federal government’s power to harass, shake down and spy on the American people, as was exemplified yet again recently when Pennsylvania’s Office of Homeland Security was caught conducting surveillance on peaceful protest groups with the aid of an Israeli security company who listed Second Amendment groups amongst others as terrorists.

Given how both Bush and Clinton before him exploited terror attacks on U.S. soil to boost their flagging political agendas, we should be wary of Obama and his masters making good use of their own “October surprise” to counter record low approval figures for Congress on the eve of the midterm elections.

Talk show hosts such as Michael Savage have long been warning of a “Reichstag fire-like event” would be concocted to reinvigorate support behind Obama and given that his advisors include such ruthless individuals as Rahm Emanuel, the knife wielding son of a former Israeli terrorist who was involved in bombing hotels, marketplaces as well as massacres, we would be naive to put anything past these people.

Indeed, it was only two months ago that former Clinton advisor Robert Shapiro wrote in the Financial Times that the only thing that could save Obama’s tenuous grip on power was a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Shapiro was clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%.

Similarly, Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the OKC bombing to demonize his political enemies as right-wing extremists. As Jack Cashill points out, Clinton “descended on Oklahoma City with an approval rating in the low 40s and left town with a rating well above 50 and the Republican revolution buried in the rubble.”

Only by exploiting a domestic terror attack which can be blamed on right-wing radicals, or by rallying the country round another war in the middle east, can Obama hope to reverse the tide of anti-incumbency candidates that threaten to drastically dilute the power monopoly of establishment candidates from both major political parties in Washington.

Shapiro is by no means the first to point out that terror attacks on U.S. soil and indeed anywhere in the world serve only to benefit those in positions of power.

During the latter years of the Bush presidency, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld mused with Pentagon top brass that shrinking Capitol Hill support for expanding the war on terror could be corrected with the aid of another terror attack.

Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star in July 2007 that “The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago.”

The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which yearned for new attacks that would “validate” the President’s war on terror and “restore his image as a leader of the American people.”

In June 2007, the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.

The Obama administration has proven itself to be alarmingly adept at lying about every issue under the sun, so why should we believe any different when it comes to the terror threat to America?

Original Article…Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

CtPatriot: Ive  Felt From the Beginning That a Terror Attack would Be the Only way To Keep Obama and The Elites in Total Control.. An October Surprise as they call it…Bet They Blame it On the Tea Party or another Political Enemy…