(VIDEO) Wealthy Multi-Millionare Nancy Pelosi ‘All About Fairness’ With Your Money, JUST NOT HERS!!!

Pelosi: ‘It’s All About Fairness in Our Country’

October 19, 2010
by Jonathon M. Seidl
TheBlaze.Com

Speaking at a United Steelworkers event on Monday, Nancy Pelosi railed against the wealthy and income inequality in America:

“We’re talking about addressing the disparity of income where the wealthy people continue to get wealthier and some other people are falling out of the middle class when we want to bring many more people into the middle class.

But that disparity is not just about wages alone, that disparity is about ownership and equity. It’s all about fairness in our country,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said to the United Steelworkers on Monday.

Pelosi: “If Someone Punches You, You Punch Them Right Back”

Pelosi Event Protested In Pittsburgh

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) ―
Oct 18, 2010

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi attended an event in Pittsburgh.

While she was met with cheers on the inside, outside a group of people protested.

Pelosi spoke to female, mostly Democrat, union steelworkers. She told the audience the country could not go back to what she called the failed policies of the Bush administration.

“The Republicans say if they took over, they would go back to the exact same agenda,” she said. “We are not going back. We are not going back.”

She said Pennsylvania would be one of the most important states in the upcoming election.

Meantime, KDKA’s Jon Greiner reports a small group of protestors taunted Pelosi supporters in the convention center, saying it’s time for Democrats to stop blaming the Bush administration for current economic troubles.

“If Obama really wanted to do something, he could do something and he’s not doing it,” Cheryl Whitehouse, a protestor, said. “He’s making it worse as far as I’m concerned and [Pelosi’s] not helping matters.”

Original Article….Pelosi Event Protested In Pittsburgh

CtPatriot:  Doesn’t Effort Have anything to Do with Reward Anymore? … I Cannot wait Until This Hypocrite, Liar is No Longer Speaker Of the House….

(VIDEO) Anchorman Doug McKelway FIRED For Story About Obama and ‘Far Left’ Environmentalists…CENSORSHIP!!!

Canned: Journalist Reportedly Axed for Story About Prez and ‘Far Left’ Environmentalists

WJLA-TV fires veteran anchor Doug McKelway, cites insubordination, misconduct

By Paul Farhi
Washington Post Staff Writer
September 17, 2010

WJLA-TV has fired veteran anchorman Doug McKelway for a verbal confrontation this summer with the station’s news director that came after McKelway broadcast a sharply worded live report about congressional Democrats and President Obama.

McKelway was placed on indefinite suspension in late July after his run-in with ABC7’s news director and general manager, Bill Lord. In a letter to McKelway this week, the station said it was terminating his contract immediately, citing insubordination and misconduct.

Amid the ongoing BP oil spill in July, McKelway covered a Capitol Hill demonstration by environmental groups protesting the influence of oil-industry contributions to members of Congress.

In his piece, McKelway said the sparsely attended event attracted protesters “largely representing far-left environmental groups.” He went on to say the protest “may be a risky strategy because the one man who has more campaign contributions from BP than anybody else in history is now sitting in the Oval Office, President Barack Obama, who accepted $77,051 in campaign contributions from BP.”

After a brief taped segment updating efforts to cap the BP well, McKelway added that the Senate was unlikely to pass “cap-and-trade” legislation this year, because “the Democrats are looking at the potential for huge losses in Congress come the midterm elections. And the last thing they want to do is propose a huge escalation in your electric bill, your utility bill, before then.”

Lord took exception to McKelway’s reporting and asked to meet with him, according to several station sources who were granted anonymity to discuss the sensitive personnel matter. A shouting match between the two men ensued, leading to McKelway’s suspension, sources said.

McKelway has alleged liberal favoritism in news reporting before; when he left his anchor chair at WRC after nine years to join WJLA in mid-2001, he blasted the station’s lack of “balance,” in a newspaper article.

McKelway declined to comment on his status at WJLA; Lord also declined to comment.

(VIDEO) GOP Establishment Hit Job: Karl Rove Rips Tea-Party’s Christine O’Donnell, After Win…

DeceptiCON Karl Rove has Meltdown over Christine O’Donnell

Mikechurch.com
Sept 15 2010

The Republican establishment began to show cracks after Tea-Party candidate Christine O’Donnell upset status-quo RHINO republican Mike Castle in the Delaware Republican Senate Primary. Nine-Term GOP Congressional House Representative, Castle who voted for Cap and Trade and who has shown little support for the inherent right to bear arms, largely dismissed the candidacy of Nominee O’Donnell.

As the video continues, we see Straussian Neo Conservative Karl Rove continue the character assassination and rumor-mongering forwarded by the Republican establishment against O’Donnell throughout the primary campaign in a fashion similar to his “Black Love Child” attacks against Senator McCain during the 2000 Presidential Primaries.

DeceptiCON Karl Rove has Meltdown over Christine O’Donnell

Delaware winner Christine O’Donnell bashes ‘cannibalism’

Politico.com
Sept 15 2010
By MIKE ALLEN

Wednesday morning attacked “Republican cannibalism” and said she doesn’t need the GOP establishment to win her Delaware race in November.

“They never thought that I could win this race, and I believe that we can win without them,” O’Donnell told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on “Good Morning America.”

“This is about giving the political power back to we, the people, and we proved the so-called experts wrong. So I think a few of them, perhaps, may have their pride hurt this morning. But, you know, I didn’t count on the establishment to win the primary. I’m not counting on the voters of Delaware.”

O’Donnell said she won partly because of Sarah Palin’s endorsement.

“When the mudslinging started, … [and] Governor Palin stood up and so boldly made a statement that she supported me, it allowed [voters] to get past the politics of personal destruction,” O’Donnell. “She helped to bring it back on track.”

O’Donnell decried “Republican cannibalism” after Stephanopoulos played a clip of Karl Rove criticizing her on Fox News’ “Hannity” after her victory Tuesday night.

Rove said: “It does conservatives little good to support candidates who, … while they may be conservative in their public statements, do not evince the characteristics of rectitude and sincerity and character that the voters are looking for. … There’s just a lot of nutty things she’s been saying. …

“I’m for the Republican. But I gotta tell ya: We were looking at eight to nine seats in the Senate [of the 10 needed for the majority]. We’re now looking at seven to eight, in my opinion. This is not a race we’re gonna be able to win.”

Delaware winner Christine O’Donnell bashes ‘cannibalism’

Climategate Top Scientist Phil Jones at Center of Scandal Admits: There has Been No Global Warming Since 1995!!! WTF?????

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

By Jonathan Petre
Last updated at 5:12 PM on 14th February 2010

* Data for vital ‘hockey stick graph’ has gone missing
* There has been no global warming since 1995
* Warming periods have happened before – but NOT due to man-made changes

The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.

Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.

The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.

Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists were manipulating data.

The raw data, collected from hundreds of weather stations around the world and analysed by his unit, has been used for years to bolster efforts by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to press governments to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

Following the leak of the emails, Professor Jones has been accused of ‘scientific fraud’ for allegedly deliberately suppressing information and refusing to share vital data with critics.

Discussing the interview, the BBC’s environmental analyst Roger Harrabin said he had spoken to colleagues of Professor Jones who had told him that his strengths included integrity and doggedness but not record-keeping and office tidying.

Mr Harrabin, who conducted the interview for the BBC’s website, said the professor had been collating tens of thousands of pieces of data from around the world to produce a coherent record of temperature change.

That material has been used to produce the ‘hockey stick graph’ which is relatively flat for centuries before rising steeply in recent decades.

According to Mr Harrabin, colleagues of Professor Jones said ‘his office is piled high with paper, fragments from over the years, tens of thousands of pieces of paper, and they suspect what happened was he took in the raw data to a central database and then let the pieces of paper go because he never realised that 20 years later he would be held to account over them’.

Asked by Mr Harrabin about these issues, Professor Jones admitted the lack of organisation in the system had contributed to his reluctance to share data with critics, which he regretted.

But he denied he had cheated over the data or unfairly influenced the scientific process, and said he still believed recent temperature rises were predominantly man-made.

Asked about whether he lost track of data, Professor Jones said: ‘There is some truth in that. We do have a trail of where the weather stations have come from but it’s probably not as good as it should be.

‘There’s a continual updating of the dataset. Keeping track of everything is difficult. Some countries will do lots of checking on their data then issue improved data, so it can be very difficult. We have improved but we have to improve more.’

He also agreed that there had been two periods which experienced similar warming, from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to 1998, but said these could be explained by natural phenomena whereas more recent warming could not.

He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no ‘statistically significant’ warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend.

And he said that the debate over whether the world could have been even warmer than now during the medieval period, when there is evidence of high temperatures in northern countries, was far from settled.

Sceptics believe there is strong evidence that the world was warmer between about 800 and 1300 AD than now because of evidence of high temperatures in northern countries.

But climate change advocates have dismissed this as false or only applying to the northern part of the world.

Professor Jones departed from this consensus when he said: ‘There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia.

‘For it to be global in extent, the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.

‘Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today, then obviously the late 20th Century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm than today, then the current warmth would be unprecedented.’

Sceptics said this was the first time a senior scientist working with the IPCC had admitted to the possibility that the Medieval Warming Period could have been global, and therefore the world could have been hotter then than now.

Professor Jones criticised those who complained he had not shared his data with them, saying they could always collate their own from publicly available material in the US. And he said the climate had not cooled ‘until recently – and then barely at all. The trend is a warming trend’.

Mr Harrabin told Radio 4’s Today programme that, despite the controversies, there still appeared to be no fundamental flaws in the majority scientific view that climate change was largely man-made.

But Dr Benny Pieser, director of the sceptical Global Warming Policy Foundation, said Professor Jones’s ‘excuses’ for his failure to share data were hollow as he had shared it with colleagues and ‘mates’.

He said that until all the data was released, sceptics could not test it to see if it supported the conclusions claimed by climate change advocates.

He added that the professor’s concessions over medieval warming were ‘significant’ because they were his first public admission that the science was not settled.

(VIDEO) Obama Clueless Without Teleprompters…. Town Hall meeting in Tampa, Fla.

Sat 30th Jan, 2010

A gutsy college student asks Obama a question. The president states, “The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.”


President Obama takes State of the Union show on the road to talk up jobs, high-speed rail

BY Kenneth R. Bazinet
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

January 29th 2010

WASHINGTON – President Obama took his State of the Union show on the road Thursday, pressing his case in Florida for a jobs bill, health care reform and high-speed rail projects.

“The worst of the storm has passed. But I think all of you understand the devastation remains,” Obama told a lively audience at a town hall-style meeting in Tampa. “One in 10 Americans still can’t find work. That’s why creating jobs has to be our No. 1 priority in 2010.”

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid announced he will push forward a jobs bill next week that is cheaper than the $154 billion measure the House approved late last year.

Obama faces opposition from Republicans who contend the first stimulus package didn’t solve the problem.

“The stimulus simply isn’t working, but rather than admit it, the President and congressional Democrats are doubling down and calling for even more government ‘stimulus’ spending – wasting even more taxpayer dollars,” House GOP leader John Boehner said.

State of Union Fact Check: Obama: Liar Liar!!! Obama’s Own Reality…

Fact Check: How State of Union Compares With Reality

AP

A look at some of Obama’s claims in the State of the Union and how they compare with the facts…

WASHINGTON — President Obama, who once considered government spending freezes a hatchet job, told Americans on Wednesday it’s now part of his solution to the exploding deficit. He didn’t explain what had changed.

His State of the Union speech skipped over a variety of complex realities in laying out a “common-sense” call to action.

A look at some of his claims and how they compare with the facts:

OBAMA: “Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t.”

THE FACTS: The anticipated savings from this proposal would amount to less than one percent of the deficit — and that’s if the president can persuade Congress to go along.

Obama is a convert to the cause of broad spending freezes. In the presidential campaign, he criticized Republican opponent John McCain for suggesting one. “The problem with a spending freeze is you’re using a hatchet where you need a scalpel,” he said a month before the election. Now, Obama wants domestic spending held steady in most areas where the government can control year to year costs. The proposal is similar to McCain’s.

——

OBAMA: “I’ve called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can’t be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. Yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I will issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans.”

THE FACTS: Any commission that Obama creates would be a weak substitute for what he really wanted — a commission created by Congress that could force lawmakers to consider unpopular remedies to reduce the debt, including curbing politically sensitive entitlements like Social Security and Medicare. That idea crashed in the Senate this week, defeated by equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans. Any commission set up by Obama alone would lack authority to force its recommendations before Congress, and would stand almost no chance of success.

——

OBAMA: Discussing his health care initiative, he said: “Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan.”

THE FACTS: The Democratic legislation now hanging in limbo on Capitol Hill aims to keep people with employer-sponsored coverage — the majority of Americans under age 65 — in the plans they already have. But Obama can’t guarantee g point of contention for the president. In December, the administration reported that recipients of direct assistance from the government created or saved about 650,000 jobs. The number was based on self-reporting by recipients and some of the calculations were shown to be in error.

The Congressional Budget Office has been much more guarded than Obama in characterizing the success of the stimulus plan. In November, it reported that the stimulus increased the number of people employed by between 600,000 and 1.6 million “compared with what those values would have been otherwise.” It said the ranges “reflect the uncertainty of such estimates.” And it added: “It is impossible to determine how many of the reported jobs would have existed in the absence of the stimulus package.”

——

OBAMA: He called for action by the White House and Congress “to do our work openly, and to give our people the government they deserve.”

THE FACTS: Obama skipped past a broken promise from his campaign — to have the negotiations for health care legislation broadcast on C-SPAN “so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies.” Instead, Democrats in the White House and Congress have conducted the usual private negotiations, making multibillion-dollar deals with hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and other stakeholders behind closed doors. Nor has Obama lived up consistently to his pledge to ensure that legislation is posted online for five days before it’s acted upon.

——

OBAMA: “We will continue to go through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work. We’ve already identified $20 billion in savings for next year.”

THE FACTS: Identifying savings is far from achieving them. If the past is any guide, little will result from this exercise because Congress routinely rejects the White House’s suggested spending cuts.

——

OBAMA: “The United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades.”

THE FACTS: Despite insisting early last year that they would complete the negotiations in time to avoid expiration of the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in early December, the U.S. and Russia failed to do so. And while officials say they think a deal on a new treaty is within reach, there has been no breakthrough. A new round of talks is set to start Monday. One important sticking point: disagreement over including missile defense issues in a new accord. If completed, the new deal may arguably be the farthest-reaching arms control treaty since the original 1991 agreement. An interim deal reached in 2002 did not include its own rules on verifying nuclear reductions.


OBAMA: Drawing on classified information, he claimed more success than his predecessor at killing terrorists: “And in the last year, hundreds of al-Qaida’s fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed — far more than in 2008.”

THE FACTS: It is an impossible claim to verify. Neither the Bush nor the Obama administration has published enemy body counts, particularly those targeted by armed drones in the Pakistan-Afghan border region. The pace of drone attacks has increased dramatically in the last 18 months, according to congressional officials briefed on the secret program.

Tiger Woods BUSTED with #1 Rachel Uchitel…Elin Finds Texts… NEW HOT PHOTOS

Hey, just ask my mistress!

Tiger had Mistress Rachel Uchitel lie to Elin

By DAN MANGAN
January 26, 2010

Tiger Woods picked the worst character witness to try to prove to his wife that he wasn’t cheating — actually putting his favorite mistress on the phone with her to convince her the claims were bogus, a bombshell report claimed yesterday.

The superstar golfer thought he could get off the hook by arranging the bizarre, half-hour phone chat between Elin Nordegren and New York City party girl Rachel Uchitel on Thanksgiving eve, the Web site Daily Beast reported.

During the call, Uchitel denied an upcoming National Enquirer story that said she and Woods were lovers, sources close to Nordegren told the site.

But the lie unraveled hours later, when a still-suspicious Nordegren allegedly found a text to Uchitel on her hubby’s phone that read: “You are the only one I’ve ever loved.”

Nordegren went ballistic — setting off a chain of events that culminated in his fateful SUV crash outside his mansion in Windermere, Fla.

After her husband popped an Ambien to sleep, the furious wife, posing as Woods, sent Uchitel a text from the phone, said sources close to Nordegren.

“I miss you,” the text read. “When are we seeing each other again?”

Uchitel texted back that she was surprised Woods was still awake and indicated that the pair had chatted previously that night, the sources said.

Nordegren then called Uchitel, who picked up the phone believing it was Woods.

“I knew it was you,” Nordegren said.

“Oh f- – -,” Uchitel replied, quickly hanging up.

Nordegren woke Woods in a fury, screaming at him as he was still bleary from sleep, the sources said.

After he locked himself in a bathroom, Nordegren again grabbed his phone and saw that he had, after waking, texted Uchitel, telling her that his wife now knew of their affair, that he was going to pack his bags and that he could be getting divorced soon.

When Woods emerged from the bathroom, Nordegren swung her fists at him and hoisted a golf club to chase him from the house.

A barefoot Woods hopped into his SUV and sped off, but he didn’t get far — hitting a fire hydrant and then a tree not far from his driveway.

An ambulance crew found him lying in the street, with the SUV’s windows knocked out.

After Woods was released from a hospital that day, he was taken to a secret location because his wife was still enraged, The Daily Beast reported.

The whole debacle occurred as the National Enquirer was set to break its story around Thanksgiving that Woods had been cheating with Uchitel.

Woods had tried to dodge the bullet by warning his wife about the report and telling her that he merely had met Uchitel at one or two social outings. That’s when he got Uchitel on the phone with her.


Elin’s decided not to divorce Tiger: report

The divorce is off — for the good of the kids.

Tiger Woods’ wife Elin Nordegren is hoping to save her marriage because she doesn’t want to raise their two kids without a dad, and trekked to Mississippi — where Woods is holed up in sex rehab — last week to prove it.

During the past week, Nordegren, 30, visited her husband at the Gentle Path sexual addiction clinic in Hattiesburg, Miss., where he has been getting treatment.

“She definitely stood out,” a Corner Market staffer in Hattiesburg, Miss., told Us Magazine, of Elin, who shopped at the high-end grocer on Jan. 23. “She was beautiful.”

Notes another eyewitness, “She was walking around alone and trying to keep to herself.”