Obamacare & Eugenics 101: Princeton Professor “Quite Reasonable” To Murder Disabled Babies? (VIDEO)

Ct Patriot: Let me ask you something? Is this 1938 in Nazi Germany? It sure seems like it to me. I am sure anyone who escaped the horrors of Hitlers Reich and made it to America that is still alive today would be more than glad to explain to the sheeple of our nation that this is exactly what happened in Germany in the late 30’s. Good ole’ Adolph nationalizted health care as well. And whom were the first people he decided to remove from society? the handicapped and “simple minded” as they liked to say. Just like this Princeton professor is saying, But its not him I am worried about. Its In the Law, Yes there are Death Panels people. So they start with the weakest among us, those who cannot defend themselves. The unborn and born with problems. Then I am sure the Veterans, are true heroes are next. You can already see what Obama has done to the VA hospitals. So after Obamacare removes them from the burden on the socialist utopia he has created. Who is next? My guess Christians and anyone else who doesn’t fit into Obama’s brave new world. Can’t we see where this is all going before it is too late? If it is not already?  Are we now a country without a spine? A soul? A conscience? Take a look below and let me know what you think about Obamacare’s Nazi-ish Eugenics Program?

ETHICS PROFESSOR SAYS IT’S “QUITE REASONABLE” TO KILL DISABLED BABIES VIA OBAMACARE

Has anyone else noticed that most professors of ethics aren’t exactly…ummm….ethical?

by DAISY LUTHER

THE ORGANIC PREPPER

APRIL 21, 2015

Has anyone else noticed that most professors of ethics aren’t exactly…ummm….ethical? At least the ones who get quoted, anyway.

A professor at the highly esteemed Princeton University doesn’t want his Obamacare premiums to increase because of caring for severely disabled babies. Dr. Pete Singer, who teaches ethics (but perhaps needs a little refresher on what the word “ethics” means) argued during a radio interview on Sunday that America should be more accepting of “intentionally ending the lives of severely disabled infants.”

First, a definition:

Ethics:  that branch of philosophy dealingwith values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightnessand wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness ofthe motives and ends of such actions.

In the famous words of Inigo Montoya, “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Singer, a longtime mouthpiece for eugenicists everywhere, has previously drawn fire for his belief that the right to life is directly related to a person’s intelligence and  ability to feel pleasure and pain, is back in the spotlight.  In 1993, wrote a treatise called “Practical Ethics: Taking Life: Humans.”

Singer argued for the morality of “non-voluntary euthanasia” for human beings not capable of understanding the choice between life and death, including “severely disabled infants, and people who through accident, illness, or old age have permanently lost the capacity to understand the issue involved.”

For Singer, the wrongness of killing a human being is not based on the fact that the individual is alive and human. Instead, Singer argued it is “characteristics like rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness that make a difference.” (source)

He clearly hasn’t changed his mind. During the interview he argued that it was “quite reasonable” to ration healthcare for disabled infants:

I think if you had a health-care system in which governments were trying to say, “Look, there are some things that don’t provide enough benefits given the costs of those treatments. And if we didn’t do them we would be able to do a lot more good for other people who have better prospects,” then yes.

I think it would be reasonable for governments to say, “This treatment is not going to be provided on the national health service if it’s a country with a national health service. Or in the United States on Medicare or Medicade.”

For full article click here please

Eugenics & Obamacare – The Ultimate in Political Manipulation

Ed Wood

January 1, 2014

Eugenics. It’s a word we don’t hear much these days, but its results are all around us. Back on the farm we called it “selective breeding.” Every dairyman or herdsman or Kentucky Derby contender selects the best of his herd as breeding stock. Can the same principle be applied to humans? Of course. Adolph Hitler used the practice to create what he called a “master race.” Loretta Lynn and Conway Twitty recorded, “You Are the Reason Our Kids are Ugly.” Nobody wants ugly kids, so in this enlightened era of single motherhood, sperm banks catalog their inventory according to eye color, hair color, nose shape, etc. Eugenics? Of course. Harmless? Probably. But are more sinister uses possible? Certainly.

Is the concept new? Of course not. The founder of eugenics, Sir Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin, felt that the softness of civilization had prevented the kind of natural selection occurring in Darwin’s Origin of Species from happening in humans, thus creating an unnaturally high number of weak and feeble-minded people. So it was up to governments to augment natural selection through the practice of selective breeding — or eugenics. At that time it was felt that desirable citizens tended to be white, athletic, intelligent, and wealthy, and those it considered to be undesirable tended to be black, Jewish, disabled, or poor. So the power of the state was, and still is, encouraged to promote increases in the number of desirable citizens (positive eugenics) and decreases in the number of undesirable citizens (negative eugenics).
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/eugenics-obamacare-ultimate-political-manipulation/#ij5JUfjLycD8p25B.99

“Stupid Americans” You got Screwed, ObamaCare Authors Played You For Suckers! (3 VIDEOS)

Ct Patriot:Don’t you see how much they hate us? You stupid Americans…I said this at the time. Go back and look it up. And they are right on the whole we are a nation of dumb asses. I just don’t see why I need to suffer because my neighbors are simple minded.

OBAMACARE ARCHITECT: “LACK OF TRANSPARENCY” WAS KEY TO FOOLING ‘STUPID AMERICANS’

Johnathan Gruber admits deception on Affordable Health Care Act vital to getting bill passed

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

NOVEMBER 10, 2014

In a newly uncovered video, Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber admits that a “lack of transparency” was key in getting the Affordable Care Act passed because “the stupidity of the American voter” would have otherwise killed the bill.

From 2009-2010 Gruber, a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, served as a technical consultant to the Obama Administration during which time he helped craft the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare.

During a recent panel discussion, Gruber explained that the characterization of the individual mandate as a tax, which led to the Supreme Court upholding it as such, was not actually a tax at all.
“This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes,” stated Gruber. “If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay, so it’s written to do that. In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed.”

“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” he added. “And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical for the thing to pass. Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

for full article please click here

SECOND VIDEO EMERGES OF OBAMACARE ARCHITECT CALLING AMERICANS “STUPID”

Gruber paid $400,000 by administration, visited White House a dozen times

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

NOVEMBER 12, 2014

Despite telling MSNBC that his comments were “off the cuff,” a second video has emerged of Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber saying the law was passed because Americans were “too stupid” to understand it.

During an appearance on Ronan Farrow Daily, Gruber tried to explain away his initial comments by claiming he was speaking “off the cuff” when he said that a “lack of transparency” was crucial in fooling ‘stupid Americans’ during the effort to pass Obamacare.

“I spoke inappropriately and I regret having made those comments,” said Gruber.
However, another video has emerged from a previous event which illustrates how the MIT professor’s characterization of Americans as “stupid” was a common theme during his public appearances last year.

The clip is from remarks made by Gruber during a lecture at Washington University in St. Louis on October 4, 2013.

for full article click here please

THIRD GRUBER VIDEO REVEALS HOW ADMINISTRATION SOUGHT TO HIDE OBAMACARE TAX

“So basically it’s the same thing – we just tax insurance companies, they pass on higher prices”

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

NOVEMBER 12, 2014

Despite claiming that he spoke “off the cuff” when he said that a “lack of transparency” was key in fooling ‘stupid Americans’ to accept the passage of Obamacare, a third video has emerged of MIT economics professor Jonathan Gruber in which he admits that the administration exploited Americans’ “lack of economic understanding” to hide the fact that ACA was a direct tax on the customer.

The clip comes from a November 5, 2012 speech at Rhode Island University. In the first part of the video, Gruber laments the fact that Americans do not have to pay tax on health insurance provided by employers.

The MIT professor then explains how under Obamacare, Americans’ “lack of economic understanding” would be exploited so as to make them think that the “evil insurance companies” were the ones being taxed, when in reality the companies simply “pass on higher prices” to the customer.

“I have been making this speech for twelve years and people would come up to me and say, ‘but wait a second you’re going to tax my heath insurance?’ And I’d say no, no, no! We’re going to tax subsidies on your health insurance. And they’d go ‘you’re going to tax my heath insurance?’ And you just can’t get through its politically impossible. So despite the fact we thought we might get this as part of the law it was going to be dead.”

“Until a second Massachusetts hero arose, John Kerry. John Kerry said no-no we’re not going to tax your heath insurance, we’re going to tax those evil insurance companies. We’re going to impose a tax that if they sell health insurance that’s too expensive we’re going to tax them. And conveniently the tax rate will happen to be the marginal tax rate on the income tax code. So basically it’s the same thing – we just tax insurance companies, they pass on higher prices, that offsets the tax break we get into being the same thing. It’s a very clever basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”

for full article click here please

I Don’t Have Obamacare, Am I Going to Jail At A Fema Labor Camp?

Get Obamacare Or Go To FEMA Prison 2014 Update (Video)

August 11, 2014 

(Before It’s News)

 (N.Morgan) Among the more deliberate things to make this country socialist, the Obamacare debacle is one of the regime’s main causes. In the confusion, and fear of not being insured, most Americans made an effort to get signed up for this disastrous healthcare campaign. Now, a new issue has arisen, stating that if you don’t get Obamacare you will go to jail. Medical tyranny comes in all forms and this is the most severe to date. Do your own research before you make a decision on healthcare, read all of the fine print. There are a lot of disinformation people that will put down videos like this, do your own homework and don’t believe others.

Obamacare Labor Camps Under Construction In Multiple American States 

Those who are unable to afford the steep Obamacare premiums are going to be faced with a lot more than just extensive fines at the end of every tax year. It has been reported that several Obamacare “labor camps” are being constructed around the nation where those who refuse or are unable to drum up the funds for the new insurance plans will be temporarily detained in order to work off fines.

Sources say that an Amtrack rail car repair facility in Indiana was the first in the country to be converted into an Obamacare detainment and processing center. There have allegedly been multiple facility conversions in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado and California.

Photographic and video evidence shows facilities to be equipped with large 3-4 inch gas mains that are connected to large furnaces which may function as crematoriums. Also seen are several helicopter landing pads, red-blue-green zones for classifying and processing incoming personnel, one way turnstiles, barracks, towers and electrified fences fitted with razor wire to prevent escape.

Indiana residents were alarmed to hear that their city would be the first to support this sort of systematic imprisonment of people unwilling or unable to conform to the Obamacare health plans. Michelle Seymour of Amboy IN had the following to say in regards to these recent developments, “I have two elderly parents who are having trouble keeping their healthcare benefits since this whole Obamacare thing began, and now they might be forced into labor for something they never wanted? They are retired! You can’t force the elderly to do hard physical labour, it will kill them!”

– See more at: http://nationalreport.net/obamacare-labor-camps-construction-multiple-american-states/#sthash.P0O8mOMJ.dpuf

Find the FEMA Camp Nearest You

Dave Gibson 
The Examiner 
June 13th, 2013

The evidence that we the people, are at risk of being placed under martial law, and losing all of our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution is overwhelming.

On October 17, 2006, President Bush signed into law, the John Warner Defense Authorization Act. The law allows the President to declare a “public emergency” at his own discretion, and place federal troops anywhere throughout the United States. Under this law, the President also now has the authority to federalize National Guard troops without the consent of Governors, in order to restore “public order.” The President can now deploy federal troops to U.S. cities, at will, which eliminates the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act.

In short, President Obama can now declare Martial Law anytime he sees fit to do so.

An Excerpt from the John Warner Defense Authorization Act follows:

“Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies.” Section 333, “Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law” states that “the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of (“refuse” or “fail” in) maintaining public order, “in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.”

On October 1, 2008 the U.S. Army´s 1st Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division began their stateside mission under U.S. Northern Command. It was the first time that an active duty Army unit has been assigned this type of mission. They are known as the CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force. They are responsible for responding to terrorist attacks, and restoring order in case of civil unrest.

Among supposed humanitarian duties, their specific job is to provide crowd and traffic control, and to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.

In addition to their standard weapons, the 1st Brigade has been equipped with mobile road blocks, spike strips for stopping vehicles, shields and batons, beanbag bullets, and taser guns.

In September 2008, Col. Roger Cloutier told the Army Times: “It´s a new modular package of non-lethal capabilities that they´re fielding. They´ve been using pieces of it in Iraq, but this is the first time that these modules were consolidated and this package fielded, and because of this mission we´re undertaking we were the first to get it.”

The soldiers of the Third Infantry Divison are battle-hardened combat veterans and have done three tours of duty in Iraq, they hardly seem suited to “crowd control” duties.

Ordinarily, such use of the military on U.S. soil would violate the law. However, with Bush´s order to suspend Posse Comitatus, the military is now free to patrol the streets of our cities and arrest American citizens.

Then, in the summer of 2009, a somewhat disturbing ad began appearing on internet employment sites, the ad in question was placed by the National Guard. Apparently, the Guard is now looking for people to work at internment camps.

Here is the ad as it appeared:

Correction Officer Internment / Resettlement Specialist

As an Internment/Resettlement Specialist for the Army National Guard, you will ensure the smooth running of military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility, similar to those duties conducted by civilian Corrections Officers. This will require you to know proper procedures and military law; and have the ability to think quickly in high-stress situations. Specific duties may include assisting with supervision and management operations; providing facility security; providing custody, control, supervision, and escort; and counseling individual prisoners in rehabilitative programs.

So, why is the National Guard hiring “Internment / Resettlement Specialists?”

On December 31, 2011, while on vacation in Hawaii, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law which in addition to allocating $662 billion to the Pentagon also contains a measure which allows U.S. citizens to be taken into custody and held indefinitely without ever being charged with a crime.

Not only can any citizen deemed a threat to “national security interests of the United States,” be held forever without receiving a trial, but the military will be the ones arresting those citizens.

NDAA Section 1022, subsection c allows “(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.”

This law basically repeals habeas corpus, by not requiring the government to give cause or evidence as to why the person is being detained; the 6th Amendment which ensures U.S. citizens the right to counsel as well as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which prevents federal military forces from being deployed and used against U.S. citizens.

And what would the government do with all of those citizens?

The following list of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) camps was complied by WorldTruthTV:

– See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/find-the-fema-camp-nearest-you_062013#sthash.6ok8ARzP.dpuf   CLICK HERE TO SEE FEMA CAMP NEAR YOU!!!

national

CtPatriot: Its all there in the law people, just read it. We know most of Congress did not. I for one do not have Insurance since my divorce. Nor do i plan on joining Obamacare, First reason being i cannot afford it. Since Congress and their controllers decided to destroy the economy and make my home worth nothing. And as we all know raises in pay are just so common these days. Plus i actually take care of my kids not the government, Go figure. But I don’t think i should be forced to buy anything i don’t want to. We all Know who wrote this “law” lol and it wasnt to help us live better , or longer… Obamacare can kiss my…..