Will Obama’s Caliphate Bring A Paris Like Massacre To A City Near You? (RAW GRAPHIC VIDEO)

Fotor01016224251Ct Patriot: So here we are again after another ISIS attack on innocent people, again in France. As the world mourns whatever happened on Friday the 13th in Paris. How do we as American citizens feel? Do we even realize as much as we may mock France they are our oldest ally, we might not even be a “free” country if not for their help during the first revolution.

How do we feel that we share this blood on our hands yet again courtesy of our ever rogue evil government. Remember we as in our president Barack Obama has not only turned a blind eye to ISIS but has financed and armed them to do such attacks as this one and eventually much worse. Or like many past false flags have our very operatives arrange and or perform the event themselves. So we all share in this by not stopping it while we can. You see Islam is the Elites weapon of choice to start the 3rd world war, just like Albert Pike had said in the late 1800’s.

My question to you is why are we bringing these animals here to our shores? Why are we watching an invasion happen right before our eyes? A government mandated invasion at that. Have we lost our damn minds?  Have we lost our damn spines?

hrhrhrI for one do not give a flying fuck what our Dictator Obama and his anti American fellow travelers want. How about you?  Are you going to “let the streets run with blood” in America because we are to Politically correct to stand up against the mental disorder that is liberalism? socialism? whatever the frig you want to call this bullshit.

We are running out of time, Islam is here with our governments blessing to behead us all in the name of Allah…do not wait until it is our loved ones next time.

DEATH TOLL AT LEAST 160 IN PARIS TERROR ATTACKS

Hostages were taken and systematically executed

ISIS ‘claims responsibility’ for Paris attacks after hundreds killed across French city

THE Islamic State terror group has reportedly claimed responsibility for the co-ordinated shootings and bombings across Paris.

Nov 14, 2015

imagesAt least 149 people are said to have been slaughtered in the French capital in a series of co-ordinated attacks last night.

A gunman reportedly shouted “it’s for Syria” and “Allahu Akbar” – the Arabic for “God is great” – before slaughtering around 100 music fans at a concert hall.

The attacks came just hours after British ISIS butcher Jihadi John was said to have been killed by a US drone strike in Syria.

And several ISIS supporters celebrated the horror attacks attacks using the sick hashtag ‘ParisIsBurning’.

downloadOne said: “God is great and thank God for these lone wolf attacks. At least 100 hostages and countless wounded.”

His tweet was sent from the Kuwait port of Mina Abdulla, according to Twitter’s location settings.

Another added: “Oh God, burn Paris as you burned the Muslims in Mali, Africa, Iraq, Syria, and Palestine.”

Some fans even boasted London, Rome and Washington DC would hit by the next horror attacks.

for full article click here please

President Obama stands firmly with jihadists as death toll climbs in Paris

November 13, 2015

images (4)With terror situation still underway in Paris, President Obama said he didn’t want to speculate on who is responsible for the attacks. He is in full scrub-a-dub jihad mode.

“This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people France, but this is an attack on all of humanity…” said Obama.

Obama’s sanction of jihad here and abroad is an attack on all of humanity.

images (6)Obama did not describe the actions as a product of radical Islamic terror, but rather condemned “extremism” and “terrorism.”

“I don’t want to speculate at this point in terms of who was responsible for this,” he said, reminding reporters of the ongoing situation on the ground.

– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/11/president-obama-stands-firmly-with-jihadists-as-death-toll-climbs-in-paris.html/#sthash.of2l4xXs.dpuf

images (5)

(VIDEO) Is Obama Going To Have America ‘Absorb A Terror Attack’ To Save His Presidency?, And Crush Resistance To Big Gov.???

Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

Ominous words suggest desperate administration could turn to false flag in bid to crush resistance against big government

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
September 22, 2010

President Obama’s ominous claim that America can “absorb” a terror attack will have many fearing that staging some kind of false flag event will be the only way the government can overturn the massive resistance to big government that has grown exponentially since Obama took office.

During an interview with journalist Bob Woodward, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.”

However, the only thing that was made stronger by 9/11 was the federal government’s power to harass, shake down and spy on the American people, as was exemplified yet again recently when Pennsylvania’s Office of Homeland Security was caught conducting surveillance on peaceful protest groups with the aid of an Israeli security company who listed Second Amendment groups amongst others as terrorists.

Given how both Bush and Clinton before him exploited terror attacks on U.S. soil to boost their flagging political agendas, we should be wary of Obama and his masters making good use of their own “October surprise” to counter record low approval figures for Congress on the eve of the midterm elections.

Talk show hosts such as Michael Savage have long been warning of a “Reichstag fire-like event” would be concocted to reinvigorate support behind Obama and given that his advisors include such ruthless individuals as Rahm Emanuel, the knife wielding son of a former Israeli terrorist who was involved in bombing hotels, marketplaces as well as massacres, we would be naive to put anything past these people.

Indeed, it was only two months ago that former Clinton advisor Robert Shapiro wrote in the Financial Times that the only thing that could save Obama’s tenuous grip on power was a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Shapiro was clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%.

Similarly, Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the OKC bombing to demonize his political enemies as right-wing extremists. As Jack Cashill points out, Clinton “descended on Oklahoma City with an approval rating in the low 40s and left town with a rating well above 50 and the Republican revolution buried in the rubble.”

Only by exploiting a domestic terror attack which can be blamed on right-wing radicals, or by rallying the country round another war in the middle east, can Obama hope to reverse the tide of anti-incumbency candidates that threaten to drastically dilute the power monopoly of establishment candidates from both major political parties in Washington.

Shapiro is by no means the first to point out that terror attacks on U.S. soil and indeed anywhere in the world serve only to benefit those in positions of power.

During the latter years of the Bush presidency, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld mused with Pentagon top brass that shrinking Capitol Hill support for expanding the war on terror could be corrected with the aid of another terror attack.

Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star in July 2007 that “The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago.”

The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which yearned for new attacks that would “validate” the President’s war on terror and “restore his image as a leader of the American people.”

In June 2007, the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.

The Obama administration has proven itself to be alarmingly adept at lying about every issue under the sun, so why should we believe any different when it comes to the terror threat to America?

Original Article…Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

CtPatriot: Ive  Felt From the Beginning That a Terror Attack would Be the Only way To Keep Obama and The Elites in Total Control.. An October Surprise as they call it…Bet They Blame it On the Tea Party or another Political Enemy…

MUST SEE VIDEO…Obama To Stage Another 9/11 To Save Presidency, Tea Party To Be Blamed…

The October Surprise Is Coming

Americanthinker.com
By Pamela Geller
July 13, 2010

The October Surprise. We all know it’s coming. In what shape, idea, form — who’s to say? Evil always surprises. Its goals are constant, the ultimate objective never changes, but inevitably it manifests itself as the savior of the day, the savior of man. The 2008 Democrat October Surprise that ushered in the first hardcore radical post-American president in American history was the “economic collapse.” Oh yes, that was a beaut.

The time before that, the moochers and the looters tried to fake Bush documents — except that the conservative blogosphere caught them red-handed, so they missed their mark.

But the party of haters, infiltrators, anti-capitalists, the party that is anti-freedom and anti-individual rights, is going to have to pull off something really catastrophic to stay in power this November. And they will, because it is abundantly clear now that they despise the premise of America and they mean to replace it with statism, the source of untold, incomprehensible human misery for centuries.

Ayn Rand wrote of statism that

a statist system — whether of a communist, fascist, Nazi, socialist or ‘welfare’ type — is based on the … government’s unlimited power, which means: on the rule of brute force. … Under statism, the government is not a policeman, but a legalized criminal that holds the power to use physical force in any manner and for any purpose it pleases against legally disarmed, defenseless victims.

With chilling prescience, Rand said, “The basic principle and the ultimate results of all statist doctrines are the same: dictatorship and destruction. The rest is only a matter of time.”

Only a matter of time.

We have a long and terrible fight in front of us. The fight is as big as the idea, the foundation, the being of this great nation, the fight for America. Yes, it’s as big as all that, and the enemy is ruthless, unscrupulous, and evil — and willing to do whatever it takes to assume absolute control. They build nothing, produce nothing, create nothing, invent nothing. They steal. They demand. They demoralize. They are destroyers.

What will October’s Surprise be? Political analyst Jack Wheeler has an idea. “A Second Great Depression,” he says, “is the Democrat Party’s path to power”:

Our country is faced with an impending economic catastrophe, a Second Great Depression. It is being brought about on purpose by a political party that cares only for keeping and expanding its power, and looks upon prosperity as a threat to that power.

You think the Democrats aren’t really that bad? Think again. Wheeler points out that they’re “now being threatened with being thrown out of power.” And what did they do when faced with a loss of power the last time? “If that party is evil enough and fascist enough to cause an economic catastrophe,” Wheeler says, “it is certainly evil and fascist enough to cause a physical catastrophe, an Ultimate October Surprise, that will frighten and enrage voters enough to preserve its power in November.”

Wheeler speculates that this could take the form of “another 9/11, a massively horrific terrorist attack, perhaps even nuclear.” Or it could involve Obama’s obvious and gross mishandling of the Gulf oil crisis, the full extent of which is (of course) being covered up in the lapdog media. And whom would the Democrats blame for whatever crisis they trump up? Whom else? The attack will be used, Wheeler suggests, “to raise suspicion about the dangerous Tea Party people and anyone who is ‘anti-government,’ enough for people to rally around their Zero-led government in fear and confusion.” And it will ultimately provide “further rationales for emergency government powers.”

Original Article…The October Surprise Is Coming

Top Clinton Official: Only A Terror Attack Can Save Obama

Paul Joseph Watson
www.prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, July 14, 2010

A former senior advisor to President Bill Clinton says that the only thing which can rescue Barack Obama’s increasingly tenuous grip on power as his approval figures continue to plunge is a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11, another startling reminder that such events only ever serve to benefit those in authority.

Buried in a Financial Times article about Obama’s “growing credibility crisis” and fears on behalf of Democrats that they could lose not only the White House but also the Senate to Republicans, Robert Shapiro makes it clear that Obama is relying on an October surprise in the form of a terror attack to rescue his presidency.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Shapiro’s veiled warning should not be dismissed lightly. He was undersecretary of commerce for economic affairs dung Clinton’s tenure in the Oval Office and also acted as principal economic adviser to Clinton in his 1991-1992 campaign. Shapiro is now Director of the Globalization Initiative of NDN and also Chair of the Climate Task Force. He is a prominent globalist who has attended numerous Bilderberg Group meetings over the past decade.

Shapiro is clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%.

Similarly, Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the OKC bombing to demonize his political enemies as right-wng extremists.As Jack Cashill points out, Clinton “descended on Oklahoma City with an approval rating in the low 40s and left town with a rating well above 50 and the Republican revolution buried in the rubble.”

Original Article…Top Clinton Official: Only A Terror Attack Can Save Obama

CtPatriot: They are Going to Do This… If We Let Them…They Are Preparing Us for It Now…

OUTRAGE!!! The Battle of 9/11’s Ailing First Responders…These People Deserve Better !!!…

Jerry Mazza
Online Journal
February 12, 2010

featured stories   The battle of 9/11s ailing first responders
scott brown     featured stories   The battle of 9/11s ailing first responders

As Susan Edelman reported in the NY Post’s billable billions, the legal battle of ailing 9/11 first responders for compensation at Ground Zero will bring literally billions in billable hours to defense lawyers. These fees could amount to half of the money payable to some 10,000 first responders and recovery workers from toxic injuries, whose suits could total some $4 billion.

Of course, the workers were not racking up triple- to four-digit hourly fees plus expenses. They did get to inhale for some period of time Ground Zero’s toxic brew straight from Pandora’s open box. That would be . . .

• Over 400 tons of asbestos, which inhaled in any quantity, cannot be expelled by the lungs.

• 90,000 liters of jet fuel containing benzene, a carcinogen that suppresses the immune system and causes leukemia.

• Mercury from over 500,000 fluorescent lights that is toxic to the nervous system, and damagingespecially to the kidneys.

• 200,000 pounds of lead and cadmium from personal computers toxic to the respiratory tract, especially damaging to kidneys.

• Polycystic aromatic hydrocarbons that cause lung, laryngeal and throat cancers.

• 130,000 gallons of transformer oil, which contains PCBs ad causes serious skin rashes and liver damage.

• Crystalline Silica from 420,000 tons of concrete, sheetrock and glass (tiny particulates that lodge in the heart, causing ischemic heart disease).

The above facts come from filmmaker Heidi Dehncke’s amazing documentary, Dust to Dust: the health effects of 9/11. I reviewed this film in my article 9/11’s Second Round of Slaughter. In fact, some 2,500 contaminants erupted from the explosions of the World Trade Center that felled Towers One, Two and Seven, plus the two, fuel-laden jetliners, turning into a toxic gray dust that hung in the air as well as settled in people’s lungs, including first responders, and on area streets, vehicles, buildings, residences, both outside and inside the city for months.

You can add to the list of deadly pollutants the red dust of nanothermite, an explosive discovered in the pile by physicist Steven Jones and his team of scientists. The red dust, aerosolized from the military explosive thermite by nanotechnology, was likely sprayed on walls and girders within the Towers. Ironically, Tower 7, the third tower to go down, was not hit by an airliner to ignite the heat-sensitive thermite. Actually, T-7 came down at 5:20 PM at the request of the building owner, WTC lessee, Larry Silverstein.

He claimed at 3 PM on 9/11 that there was so much pain and suffering that “we decided to pull it,” the term for a planned internal demolition by explosives. Yet, two hours and 20 minutes was not enough time to set up an internal demolition for that building. It had to be done well in advance. Not so surprisingly, the red nanothermite dust was found in the Tower 7 ruins as well.

The original pieces of red dust nanothermite were picked up and stored by dedicated 9/11 Truthers, one of whom, Jeanette MacKinlay, underwent brain surgery for a cancerous tumor on Wednesday in a Los Angeles hospital. May whatever force of truth and justice that we are blessed with be by her side and help her to recover. For, after all is said and done, these are the people who give their lives for truth and justice. Try to put a price tag on that.

Read entire article

Exclusive: Obama, FBI Silent On Plane Bomber’s Terror Accomplice

Paul Joseph Watson & Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Flight 253 eyewitness Kurt Haskell has astoundingly revealed how the FBI are deliberately hiding the existence of a second man who was arrested following the Christmas Day plane bombing incident after bomb-sniffing dogs detected a possible second explosive device in his luggage.

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Haskell related how after being allowed to disembark from the plane by officials, passengers were detained in customs with their carry-on luggage for six hours while they waited to be interrogated by the FBI.

Bomb sniffing dogs then detected a possible explosive device in the luggage of an Indian man around 30 years old before the man was arrested and led away to an interrogation room.

The probability that there was a bomb in the man’s luggage was all but confirmed when the FBI moved the passengers to another location. “You’re being moved,” the FBI told them, “it is not safe here. I’m sure you all saw what happened and can read between the lines and why you’re being moved.”

The identity of the second man has not been discussed by authorities or the media and Haskell’s description of his own interview with the FBI suggests that the feds are deliberately trying to bury the notion that the bomber had one or more accomplices.

The FBI was not pleased with Haskell when they conducted a follow-up interview yesterday in Michigan. They showed him close-up photographs of various people, including Mutallab, the accused bomber. “They kind of tried to trick me,” Haskell explained. The agents tried to pass off two photos of Mutallab as different people. Kurt asked the agents if they were attempting to impeach his story and smear him.

The Indian man was not included in the photographs. Neither was another Indian man who Haskell told the media had helped the bomber board the plane despite the fact that he had no passport. The sharp dressed Indian lied about the bomber’s circumstances, claiming he was a Sudanese refugee.

Haskell asked them why he was not shown a full body shot of the suspect. Haskell was eight rows back from the suspect. The FBI agents did not answer and were displeased with the question. He also asked the FBI agents if it would be more appropriate to bring the surveillance video from the Amsterdam airport instead of still photos. “I don’t think they liked that comment from me,” Haskell added. The FBI said they did not have the videotape. They also made a point to tell Haskell they were asking the questions and not him.

The agents showed Haskell a photograph of the man flagged by the bomb-sniffing dog and taken into custody in customs. “Isn’t this the man who had the bomb in his carry-on bag that you arrested in customs who you refuse to admit exists?” Haskell asked the agents. “They really didn’t like that comment from me and had no comment back to me but I said it sure looks like the man you refuse to admit exists.”

There has also been no official explanation as to the identity of another mysterious man seen calmly filming the entire flight, including the botched bombing attempt, with a video camera.

Haskell described the FBI’s handling of the aftermath of the incident as “a complete embarrassment, a total disorganizational mess that actually put us in more jeopardy than we were already in.”

Passengers were told to remain seated in the aircraft for 20 minutes after landing despite the fact security did not know at that point if there was an explosive on the plane or if the fire started by the suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab while on descent to the airport had spread under the floor in the cabin or to the fuel tanks in the wings.


Al Qaeda-linked Terrorist tried to blow up plane…Northwest Airlines flight 253

By Kevin Krolicki Kevin Krolicki – Sat Dec 26, 9:08 am ET
DETROIT (Reuters) – A Nigerian man believed to be linked to al Qaeda militants was in custody on Saturday after he tried to ignite an explosive device on a U.S. passenger plane as it approached Detroit, U.S. officials said.

The suspect, who suffered extensive burns, was overpowered by passengers and crew on the Christmas Day flight from Amsterdam. The passengers, two of whom suffered minor injuries, disembarked safely from the Delta Air Lines plane.

“We believe this was an attempted act of terrorism,” a White House official told Reuters.

British police were searching premises in central London on Saturday in connection with the incident. The man was believed to have spent time in Britain as a student and authorities were trying to establish details about his activities in the country, a British counter-terrorism source said.

European airports meanwhile tightened security checks on U.S.-bound flights in response to the failed attack.

Dutch counter-terrorism authorities said they were trying to figure out where the suspect had come from, how he had been screened and how he had managed to board the flight.

Northwest Airlines flight 253 had left Amsterdam airport on Friday with 278 passengers onboard and was approaching its destination Detroit when the man tried to ignite the device or mixture, U.S. officials said.

Representative Peter King of New York, the senior Republican on the House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee, said the explosive device was “fairly sophisticated,” and the suspect was a 23-year-old Nigerian.

Federal officials identified him as Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab, according to U.S. newspapers. ABC News and NBC News reported that he attends University College London, where he studied engineering.

King told CNN the suspect was listed in a database as having a connection to militants.

“My understanding is…that he does have al Qaeda connections, certainly extremist terrorist connections, and his name popped up pretty quickly” in a search.

“I would say we dropped the ball on this one.”

King said the suspect started his journey in Nigeria.

The Nigerian government ordered security agencies to investigate the incident and said they would cooperate fully with the American authorities.

“All the necessary security measures are in place in Nigeria. Any passenger, including crew members, on any flight is subject to the same security screening,” a spokesman for Nigeria’s Federal Airport Authority said.

Security at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport and at other airports in Europe with U.S.-bound flights was stepped up.

“This incident shows once again that vigilance is necessary at all times in the fight against terror,” European Commission vive-president Jacques Barrot said in Brussels.

Judith Sluiter, a spokeswoman for Dutch counter-terrorism agency NCTb, said it had started a probe into the incident, trying to determine where the suspect originated from.

“He did not go through passport control,” a Dutch military police spokesman said.

Passenger Richelle Keepman, arriving in Detroit, said the incident was terrifying.

“I thought — I think we all thought we weren’t going to land, we weren’t going to make it,” Keepman told NBC News.

Another passenger, Melinda Dennis, said the man was severely burned.

“His entire leg was burned. They required a fire extinguisher as well as water to put it out,” she told NBC.

“You could smell the smoke when we landed. You could smell the scent of something being burned when we landed.”

Once on the ground, the aircraft was moved to a remote area at Detroit’s airport where all baggage was being rescreened, the Transportation Security Administration said.

Citing U.S. officials, the Wall Street Journal said the Nigerian had told investigators that al Qaeda operatives in Yemen had given him the device and instructions on how to detonate it.

But NBC, citing anti-terrorism officials, said he claimed to have been acting on his own.”

PART OF A LARGER PLOT?

King said investigators were looking into whether the incident was part of a larger plot.

There is a “world-wide alert to make sure this is not part of a larger overall scheme,” he said.

The New York Times, citing a senior Homeland Security official, said the device was made from a mixture of powder and liquid and was more incendiary than explosive.

The official said Abdulmutallab told law enforcement authorities he had explosive powder taped to his leg and used a syringe filled with chemicals to mix with the powder in an attempt to cause an explosion.”

The attempt appeared similar to one eight years ago when a British-born man, Richard Reid, tried but failed to blow up a transatlantic jumbo jet by lighting explosives stuffed into his shoes. Reid, a follower of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, is serving a life sentence in a U.S. prison.

It also is the latest in a string of terrorism-related plots in the United States over the past few months. Al Qaeda militants carried out the September11, 2001, attacks in the United States in which three passenger planes were hijacked.

(Additional reporting by Todd Eastham, Jeremy Pelofsky, Mohammad Zargham and Jim Wolf in Washington; Peter Bohan in Chicago; Ben Berkowitz in Amsterdam, Rosalba O’Brien and William Maclean in London; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

Nigeria banker fears son is alleged plane attacker
DETROIT – A prominent Nigerian banker said Saturday he feared his son was the man authorities say tried to blow up a plane as it prepared to land in Detroit before nearby passengers

In Nigeria, the father told The Associated Press that his son, a former university student in London, had left Britain to travel abroad and may have gone to Yemen, an unstable country on the tip of the Arabian Peninsula where al-Qaida has increasingly found safe havens.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091226/ap_on_re_us/us_airliner_attack

Questions Regarding The Fort Hood Massacre … Why is this not seen as The Biggest Islamic Terrorist Attack on America since 9-11??? why are we SOOOOO WEAK??? and why did they report 3 shooters at first?????

Chuck Baldwin
November 20, 2009

By now, virtually everyone has read and reread the copious news accounts of the terrible shooting a few weeks ago at Fort Hood, Texas. This column will not attempt to add new details to what is already a highly scrutinized tragedy. However, I do want to pose three basic questions that, to me, are extremely glaring and, for the most part, absent from the discussion.

Question 1: Why were the soldiers not armed?Question 2: If the federal government–including the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, etc., with billions of dollars worth of technology; tens of thousands of snoops, spooks, and intelligence gatherers; and myriad Patriot Act-type laws–could not protect US soldiers on one of the most tightly secured and heavily guarded military installations in America, how can anyone in the country possibly not break out in cacophonous laughter when politicians tell us we need to surrender more liberties so that they might pass more laws to protect us crummy little peons? Or is it that, because Hasan was a Muslim, the politically correct nincompoops in charge gave him a pass?Question 3: How could one man (with no combat experience) armed with only two handguns fire over 100 rounds (demanding he reload at least 3 times) into a crowd of scores and hundreds of fearless combat-trained warriors? I must confess: this is the question that bothers me the most.

Initial reports said there were multiple shooters.

Ok i have to be honest im not sure how i feel about this but it does make me wonder and when 13 of ours troops are gone… it makes me want to know what this was … why it was Allowed to happen … This guy was batshit crazy for islam havent we seen that before??? just sayin’

http://www.infowars.com/questions-regarding-the-fort-hood-massacre/#

  • ctpatriots feed

  • an Edgy new school Conservative blog
  • FREE CtPatriot BUMPER STICKER

  • the lacs

  • KRS 1 On Obama and the New World Order

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • The Savage Nation

  • ctpatriots archives

  • Ronald Reagan on Socialism & Liberalism

  • Louis Farrakhan – “Murder by Injection”

    I can't bleiev it but he's right ...
  • Glenn Beck talks about New World Order with Ron Paul

    Is Glenn Beck yanking our chain or is he sincerely worried about the prospect of a New World Order and a One World Currency?

  • And Why does Rush Limbaugh Agree WIth Farrakahn??? Because its true?

    If  i can agree with them both  ... it makes too much sense

    Only in an Obamanation could this Occur.

  • Alex Jones The EndGame .. full version

  • Blog Engage Blog Forum and Blogging Community, Free Blog Submissions and Blog Traffic, Blog Directory, Article Submissions, Blog Traffic
  • The Obama Deception…full version

  • the Mike Church Show

  • “lil” Jimmy Norton Kills….

    How small is Jimmy???
  • Blog Catalog

    Conservative  Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
  • the Ron & Fez Show

  • RevueLink .com

  • Entertainment blog
  • Dr. Bill Deagle

  • Rense.com

  • Star Trek 2009

  • Dave Hodges: Common Sense Show

  • Submit URL @ OptionAdd Search.  
  • Follow A Ct Patriot's Blog on WordPress.com
  • Infowars.com

  • Jesus or Muhammad