Since Obama Has Taken Office, Only The Richest 10% Got Paid! How’s That Sound America?

UNDER OBAMA, ONLY RICHEST 10 PERCENT SAW INCOMES RISE

“Shares of income and wealth held by affluent families are at modern historically high levels”

 

– The Washington Times – Thursday, September 4, 2014

OBAMA-SOCIALIST-POSTER1Under President Obama, the richest 10 percent were the only income group of Americans to see their median incomes rise, according to a survey released this week by the Federal Reserve.

The Fed data covered the years 2010-2013, during which period Mr. Obama constantly campaigned against income inequality and won re-election by painting his Republican rival as a tool of Wall Street plutocrats.

 

“Data from the 2013 [Survey of Consumer Finances] confirm that the shares of income and wealth held by affluent families are at modern historically high levels,” the report said in noting that the median income fell for every 10-percent grouping except the most affluent 10 percent. 

“The 2013 SCF reveals substantial disparities in the evolution of income and net worth since the previous time the survey was conducted, in 2010,” the report stated. The SCF is conducted by the Federal reserve triennially and compiles information about family incomes, credit use, net worth and finances.

 
images (5)The 2010-2013 SCF found that even though real gross domestic product grew by 2.1 percent and civilian unemployment fell from 9.9 percent to 7.5 percent, only families at “the very top of the income distribution saw widespread income gains,” though mean median income levels still lagged behind 2007 numbers.

The report comes just a week after AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said the union group would not endorse any more Democrats that following President Obama’s economic policy.

 

 

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/4/incomes-fell-most-families-past-three-years-while-/#ixzz3CZvFL3zQ

(VIDEO) The Thrill Is Gone, Chris Matthews: Obama’s An Elitist Who Talks At Us, Not With Us…

Chris Matthews: Since Election Obama ‘Has Been Elitist And Come With A Teleprompter’

Mediaite.com
Colby Hall
Nov. 1st, 2010

With nearly all polls pointing to a significant GOP victory during tomorrow’s midterm elections, some political pundits are already starting to point fingers of blame, even if the target once was responsible for leg-thrilling oratory skills. Case in point, during an appearance with Andrea Mitchell on her eponymous MSNBC program, Chris Matthews did not demure in his blistering comparison between Candidate Obama and President Obama. Watch and see for yourself.

The thrust of Matthews’ commentary is that Obama was terrific at connecting with the people while running for office, but as president, he has been just the opposite. Rough transcript of the heart of his comments precede the video segment below:

Chris Matthews: When he was a campaigner, he said what a great country it is, what an exceptional country it is. A guy like me made it. He was patriotic and inclusive. He was interactive. Ever since he’s been president, he’s elitist and come with a teleprompter. He hasn’t listened. He’s talked at us rather than with us.

Andrea Mitchell: That’s what he’s projected?

Matthews: No, he brings the teleprompter with him.

Mitchell: You don’t think he’s interacted even with the town hall meetings?

Matthews: No. and I think he hasn’t explained himself. Lincoln had to explain the civil war. Roosevelt had to explain everything. You have to take people along with you. I think he’s guilty of the elitist charge. If you are going to spend $1.6 trillion deficit in one year, you have to explain to the American people why you did it. he never explained economics the way you were taught it.

Original Story…Chris Matthews: Since Election Obama ‘Has Been Elitist And Come With A Teleprompter’

‘Meathead’ Rob Reiner, Another Hate-Filled Liberal: Tea Parties Are Like NAZI HITLER…(HATE VIDEO)

Rob Reiner: You know what this tea party movement reminds me of? Nazism

HotAir.Com
October 23, 2010
By Allahpundit

I’d call this the intellectual highlight of last night’s Bill Maher show except that later Maher ended up asking Levi Johnston if he uses condoms now, so, hey. This is what I meant the other day about Democrats wanting to lash out at voters for being racist and crazy and Hitlerian enough to elect Republicans, but that’s too much of a risk given how many centrists and independents are committed to voting for tea party candidates next month.

You don’t want to alienate any constituencies you might otherwise be able to win back in 2012. Better for the White House to stick to a more gently condescending line about voters “not thinking clearly” or whatever and let B-list surrogates like Rachel Maddow and Meathead here do the heavy lifting.

Reiner and his fellow travelers are a lot more comfortable with Hitler analogies than I am, but if we’re going to play a game that lamentably stupid and offensive, I suppose I could chip in by noting that it ain’t the GOP making headlines lately for fearmongering speeches about shadowy foreigners threatening to destroy our democracy from within. And the hate! Like P.J. O’Rourke says, don’t forget the hate:

They don’t just hate our Republican, conservative, libertarian, strict constructionist, family values guts. They hate everybody’s guts. And they hate everybody who has any. Democrats hate men, women, blacks, whites, Hispanics, gays, straights, the rich, the poor, and the middle class.

Democrats hate Democrats most of all. Witness the policies that Democrats have inflicted on their core constituencies, resulting in vile schools, lawless slums, economic stagnation, and social immobility.

Democrats will do anything to make sure that Democratic voters stay helpless and hopeless enough to vote for Democrats…

This is not an election on November 2. This is a restraining order. Power has been trapped, abused and exploited by Democrats. Go to the ballot box and put an end to this abusive relationship. And let’s not hear any nonsense about letting the Democrats off if they promise to get counseling

Original Article…Rob Reiner: You know what this tea party movement reminds me of? Nazism

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Meathead Rob Reiner: Tea Parties Like Hitler…, posted with vodpod

(VIDEO) Wealthy Multi-Millionare Nancy Pelosi ‘All About Fairness’ With Your Money, JUST NOT HERS!!!

Pelosi: ‘It’s All About Fairness in Our Country’

October 19, 2010
by Jonathon M. Seidl
TheBlaze.Com

Speaking at a United Steelworkers event on Monday, Nancy Pelosi railed against the wealthy and income inequality in America:

“We’re talking about addressing the disparity of income where the wealthy people continue to get wealthier and some other people are falling out of the middle class when we want to bring many more people into the middle class.

But that disparity is not just about wages alone, that disparity is about ownership and equity. It’s all about fairness in our country,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said to the United Steelworkers on Monday.

Pelosi: “If Someone Punches You, You Punch Them Right Back”

Pelosi Event Protested In Pittsburgh

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) ―
Oct 18, 2010

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi attended an event in Pittsburgh.

While she was met with cheers on the inside, outside a group of people protested.

Pelosi spoke to female, mostly Democrat, union steelworkers. She told the audience the country could not go back to what she called the failed policies of the Bush administration.

“The Republicans say if they took over, they would go back to the exact same agenda,” she said. “We are not going back. We are not going back.”

She said Pennsylvania would be one of the most important states in the upcoming election.

Meantime, KDKA’s Jon Greiner reports a small group of protestors taunted Pelosi supporters in the convention center, saying it’s time for Democrats to stop blaming the Bush administration for current economic troubles.

“If Obama really wanted to do something, he could do something and he’s not doing it,” Cheryl Whitehouse, a protestor, said. “He’s making it worse as far as I’m concerned and [Pelosi’s] not helping matters.”

Original Article….Pelosi Event Protested In Pittsburgh

CtPatriot:  Doesn’t Effort Have anything to Do with Reward Anymore? … I Cannot wait Until This Hypocrite, Liar is No Longer Speaker Of the House….

(9 KINKY PHOTOS) Democratic Candidate Krystal Ball: XXX-Mas Party Dominatrix and Sex Toys…

Bloggers Post Revealing Photos of Democrat Krystal Ball

Kimball Payne
kpayne@dailypress.com
October 6, 2010

A series of suggestive costume-party photos of Democratic congressional candidate Krystal Ball dressed in a revealing outfit with a man with a sex toy on his nose have drawn new attention to the race.

Ball is a political newcomer in her first run for Congress, taking on U.S. Rep. Rob Wittman, R- Westmoreland, in Virginia’s 1st District which stretches from Newport News to Fredericksburg.

Ball admitted she was “embarrassed” when the photos emerged this week on two conservative blogs and said they were put out as part of a coordinated effort to undermine her campaign.

“I’m pretty angry about it,” Ball said. “It’s outrageous. It’s incredibly sexist.”

Ball, 29, confirmed that the photos are of her and her ex-husband during a private holiday party held shortly after Ball graduated from college six years ago. Ball is dressed in a skimpy Christmas-themed Santa outfit and is leading around a man dressed as a reindeer by a leash. The man’s nose, in an explicit nod to Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, is a bright red sex toy.

Ball said Wednesday she was shocked and angry that the photos became public and said it’s unfair that female political candidates, both Republican and Democrat, face different standards from men.

Original Article…Bloggers post revealing photos of Democrat Krystal Ball

Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill.: You Taxpayers Have an ‘Obligation’ to Fund Abortions

Congresswoman: Taxpayers Have an ‘Obligation’ to Fund Abortions

TheBlaze.com
September 29, 2010
by Meredith Jessup

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., not only believes that women should be able to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy, but also favors a full repeal of existing federal policy which limits taxpayer funding for abortions. According to the Illinois Democrat, “there’s no evidence” that increasing access to abortion services encourages people to get abortions.

CNSNews.com‘s Nichola Ballasy caught up with the congresswoman today during an event on Capitol Hill sponsored by the Center for Reproductive Freedom to ask her about call for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment. When asked about whether access to abortion may encourage more women to take the drastic step, Rep. Schakowsky replied, “No, there’s no evidence of that around the world, where access to abortion is more available but somehow women are more inclined to get one.”

“What happens is that women who don’t have access resort, as we heard today, to very dangerous, self-inflicted kinds of things in order to end, terminate the pregnancy,” she said. “And so, you know, we go back to back alley abortions. We go back to coat hangers. And, I mean, is that what we want?”

“Women who are desperate enough to do that to themselves are going to somehow – going to try to abort that pregnancy. We don’t want to do that. We don’t want to put women at greater risk.”


(VIDEO) Is Obama Going To Have America ‘Absorb A Terror Attack’ To Save His Presidency?, And Crush Resistance To Big Gov.???

Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

Ominous words suggest desperate administration could turn to false flag in bid to crush resistance against big government

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
September 22, 2010

President Obama’s ominous claim that America can “absorb” a terror attack will have many fearing that staging some kind of false flag event will be the only way the government can overturn the massive resistance to big government that has grown exponentially since Obama took office.

During an interview with journalist Bob Woodward, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.”

However, the only thing that was made stronger by 9/11 was the federal government’s power to harass, shake down and spy on the American people, as was exemplified yet again recently when Pennsylvania’s Office of Homeland Security was caught conducting surveillance on peaceful protest groups with the aid of an Israeli security company who listed Second Amendment groups amongst others as terrorists.

Given how both Bush and Clinton before him exploited terror attacks on U.S. soil to boost their flagging political agendas, we should be wary of Obama and his masters making good use of their own “October surprise” to counter record low approval figures for Congress on the eve of the midterm elections.

Talk show hosts such as Michael Savage have long been warning of a “Reichstag fire-like event” would be concocted to reinvigorate support behind Obama and given that his advisors include such ruthless individuals as Rahm Emanuel, the knife wielding son of a former Israeli terrorist who was involved in bombing hotels, marketplaces as well as massacres, we would be naive to put anything past these people.

Indeed, it was only two months ago that former Clinton advisor Robert Shapiro wrote in the Financial Times that the only thing that could save Obama’s tenuous grip on power was a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Shapiro was clearly communicating the necessity for a terror attack to be launched in order to give Obama the opportunity to unite the country around his agenda in the name of fighting terrorists, just as President Bush did in the aftermath of 9/11 when his approval ratings shot up from around 50% to well above 80%.

Similarly, Bill Clinton was able to extinguish an anti-incumbent rebellion which was brewing in the mid 1990’s by exploiting the OKC bombing to demonize his political enemies as right-wing extremists. As Jack Cashill points out, Clinton “descended on Oklahoma City with an approval rating in the low 40s and left town with a rating well above 50 and the Republican revolution buried in the rubble.”

Only by exploiting a domestic terror attack which can be blamed on right-wing radicals, or by rallying the country round another war in the middle east, can Obama hope to reverse the tide of anti-incumbency candidates that threaten to drastically dilute the power monopoly of establishment candidates from both major political parties in Washington.

Shapiro is by no means the first to point out that terror attacks on U.S. soil and indeed anywhere in the world serve only to benefit those in positions of power.

During the latter years of the Bush presidency, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld mused with Pentagon top brass that shrinking Capitol Hill support for expanding the war on terror could be corrected with the aid of another terror attack.

Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star in July 2007 that “The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago.”

The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which yearned for new attacks that would “validate” the President’s war on terror and “restore his image as a leader of the American people.”

In June 2007, the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.

The Obama administration has proven itself to be alarmingly adept at lying about every issue under the sun, so why should we believe any different when it comes to the terror threat to America?

Original Article…Will Obama Force America To “Absorb A Terror Attack” To Save His Presidency?

CtPatriot: Ive  Felt From the Beginning That a Terror Attack would Be the Only way To Keep Obama and The Elites in Total Control.. An October Surprise as they call it…Bet They Blame it On the Tea Party or another Political Enemy…

  • ctpatriots feed

  • an Edgy new school Conservative blog
  • FREE CtPatriot BUMPER STICKER

  • the lacs

  • KRS 1 On Obama and the New World Order

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • The Savage Nation

  • ctpatriots archives

  • Ronald Reagan on Socialism & Liberalism

  • Louis Farrakhan – “Murder by Injection”

    I can't bleiev it but he's right ...
  • Glenn Beck talks about New World Order with Ron Paul

    Is Glenn Beck yanking our chain or is he sincerely worried about the prospect of a New World Order and a One World Currency?

  • And Why does Rush Limbaugh Agree WIth Farrakahn??? Because its true?

    If  i can agree with them both  ... it makes too much sense

    Only in an Obamanation could this Occur.

  • Alex Jones The EndGame .. full version

  • Blog Engage Blog Forum and Blogging Community, Free Blog Submissions and Blog Traffic, Blog Directory, Article Submissions, Blog Traffic
  • The Obama Deception…full version

  • the Mike Church Show

  • “lil” Jimmy Norton Kills….

    How small is Jimmy???
  • Blog Catalog

    Conservative  Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
  • the Ron & Fez Show

  • RevueLink .com

  • Entertainment blog
  • Dr. Bill Deagle

  • Rense.com

  • Star Trek 2009

  • Dave Hodges: Common Sense Show

  • Submit URL @ OptionAdd Search.  
  • Follow A Ct Patriot's Blog on WordPress.com
  • Infowars.com

  • Jesus or Muhammad