We Have Nothing to Fear, but Obama…The Hon. James David Manning, PhD takes a page out of history by using an excerpt from FDR’s famous speech to explain the socialist ideologies of Barack Hussein Obama.
In the aftermath of the passage of Obamacare we have witnessed an onslaught of accidental truth telling by Democrats. We have heard from some that the EO does nothing. Duh. We have heard that Obamacare is really about distributing the wealth. Duh. But I found this particular but of truth telling to be most fascinating.
Liberals have derided the concept of ‘death panels’ for months ever since Sarah Palin coined the term. Nonsense, they shouted. President Obama laughingly and condescendingly dismissed the the notion. But now that it is passed, there is no problem admitting it now. Yes, there are death panels.
Paul Krugman of the NY Times appearing on This Week laughs at the notion of death panel and then goes on to explain in startling detail how the death panels will save money.
Krugman says…
The advisory panel which has the ability to make more or less binding judgments on saying this particular expensive treatment actually doesn’t do any good medically and so we are not going to pay for it. That is actually going to save quite a lot of money. We don’t know how much yet. The CBO gives it very little credit but, but most, most of the health care economists I talk to think that’s going be a really, uh a really major cost savings.
First off, I loathe dis-ingenuousness. How can you say a panel is merely ‘advisory’ when it gets to make ‘binding decisions?’ But Gramma wants to live but an impersonal panel says no because ‘it won’t do any good’ and that is binding. So Gramma dies. But that is ok because “health care economists I talk to think that’s going be a really, uh a really major cost savings.”
Video Proves Tea Party Activist Did Not Spit On Dem
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 1, 2010
House Majority Whip James Clyburn invoked civil rights era imagery to demonize opponents of Obamacare.
On March 20, Democrats and the corporate media launched a misleading propaganda offensive claiming Tea Party protesters in Washington spat on Missouri Democrat Emanuel Cleaver and hurled racial epithets at members of the Congressional Black Caucus as they walked to the Capitol to cast a vote on Obama’s authoritarian health care bill.
“The congressman was walking into the Capitol to vote, when one protester spat on him. The congressman would like to thank the U.S. Capitol Police officer who quickly escorted the other Members and him into the Capitol, and defused the tense situation with professionalism and care,” said Danny Rotert, a spokesman for Cleaver.
In fact, nobody spat on Cleaver. He wandered too close to a screaming protester and was hit by flying saliva. The “N” word cannot be heard in either of the videos below, although it is difficult to tell what beyond “kill the bill” is being yelled at the Congress critters as they flaunted their power over the plebs.
“I have heard things today that I have not heard since March 15, 1960, when I was marching to get off the back of the bus,” House Majority Whip James Clyburn, a South Carolina Democrat and the highest-ranking black official in Congress, told the CIA’s favorite newspaper, the Washington Post.
Clyburn tried to turn attention away from the fact most Americans are opposed to Obamacare and more than a few were so outraged they traveled to Washington and yelled at House members who subsequently betrayed the Constitution and handed the government authoritarian power over millions of people. He even rolled in civil rights imagery in order to make his point and prevent rational opposition.
“A lot of us have been saying for a long time that much of this, much of this is not about health care a all. And I think a lot of those people today demonstrated that this is not about health care,” he said, “it is about trying to extend a basic fundamental right to people who are less powerful.”
One has to ask why members of the House decided to wander into a crowd of people opposed to a bill they were about to vote on. Congress critters usually use a tunnel in order to avoid the commoners. But on this “historical” day they waded directly into a hostile crowd.
Is there a reason for this? Of course. It was a propaganda stunt designed by Democrats. They were well aware of the people gathered outside upset over Obama’s totalitarian care. The imagery was nearly perfect for their purposes — a crowd of howling mostly white people confronting a small number of black people. It would reaffirm what Chris Matthews and other corporate media apologists for state power have said for months — opposition to Obamacare (or anything the government does) is racist. The complaisant corporate media inserted the accusation of racism in the argument at exactly the right time. It was all part of a well orchestrated plan.
Democrats like to pretend Republicans and their compromised Tea Party followers are responsible for a brick thrown through the window of Rep. Slaughter’s office and other incidents of minor property damage. Is it possible Democrats orchestrated these events as part of their effort to demonize opposition to Obamacare?
Neal McDonough Refused Love Scenes with Virginia Madsen
By Katrina Robinson
April 1st, 2010
Virginia Madsen Love Scene Causes Casting Change
Virginia Madsen is gorgeous. Gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous. Even I, a heterosexual woman, wouldn’t hesitate to act in a love scene with her. After all, there are a lot less attractive women that I could find myself in bed with (if I were an actress), right?
Neal McDonough of Desperate Housewives fame apparently doesn’t see it that way. He and Madsen were both slotted to appear in ABC’s upcoming series Scoundrels, a remake of the New Zealand show Outrageous Fortune. The series focuses on Cheryl West (played by Madsen), whose criminal husband gets a long prison sentence. Cheryl chooses to make her family go “straight.”
Click Here to see Virginia Madsen Nude Photos...NSFW
Click Here to See More Virginia Madsen Nude Photos ...NSFW
Anyhow, McDonough refused to act in heated sex scenes with Madsen, and he was fired for it. The really interesting factor in all of this is that McDonough is known throughout the industry for refusing to engage in love scenes on screen. I understand that McDonough is a religious family man, but it’s not really cheating when it’s acting, right?
After McDonough was let go, actor David James Elliot took over. While ABC officially explained the modification as a simple casting change, it’s now obvious that there were interesting reasons behind this “simple casting change.”
10 Commandments of Pug Owners ..1. My life is likely to last 10-15 years. Any separation from you will be very painful..
hagmann and hagmann
Ctpatriot highly recommends
NRA
Fighting for our 2nd Amendment Rights
Shameless Plug
Professor Griff of Public Enemy Says No to Obama and the New World Order
Public Enemy continously plugged Jones' the Obama Deception during their set this weekend at Coachella, I figured it might have been Chuck himself. I suppose I should have known it was Professor Griff.
Creative Minority Report
Krugman says…
First off, I loathe dis-ingenuousness. How can you say a panel is merely ‘advisory’ when it gets to make ‘binding decisions?’ But Gramma wants to live but an impersonal panel says no because ‘it won’t do any good’ and that is binding. So Gramma dies. But that is ok because “health care economists I talk to think that’s going be a really, uh a really major cost savings.”
A Ct Patriot's Blog 
